Hardly shambolic

The judgment says exactly what I said - the restriction is an infringement of Article 11 subject to proof of its proportionality in respect of legitimate aims - an argument which at that time was determined in a particular way, but which does not tell you either (i) how it would be determined in different circumstances, or (ii) whether a different court would agree.

Why do feel the need to be so aggressively rude about all this, by they way?

Posted By: paulg on September 9th 2020 at 19:35:01


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in