Firstly, it's a judicial review...

Which would just send the decision back to be (likely) remade on firmer ground.

Secondly, a cursory reading of the case at
User Posted Link

Suggests that the thing was unceremoniously thrown out on its arse.

The only bit with leave to appeal didn't look like the bit you were suggesting (the paragraphs which follow your cut and paste are damning of the reasoning)

"In all reality in those circumstances, there is no realistic prospect of a court deciding in these, possibly unique, circumstances that the regulation was a disproportionate interference with the rights guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention. There is, therefore, no purpose in granting permission to bring the claim. Permission to apply for judicial review of regulation 7 of the Regulations on the grounds set out in paragraphs 16 to 17 of the supplementary grounds dated 23 June 2020 is refused."

The basis of appeal actually seems to be about the religious services stuff which they make the point is now probably moot in view of current guidance anyway.

Happy to get as technical as you like (at work) but as this is my own time I'll duck out now.

Posted By: Cardiff Canary on September 9th 2020 at 16:49:17

Message Thread

Bit tricky to see how football attendance (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 9, 10:44:24
- 6 fans per stand. Maximum attendance per match: 24 (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 9, 14:16:47
- please dont confuse Human Rights (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Sep 9, 12:18:08
  - ^ this (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Sep 9, 13:35:48
  - Yeah, this (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Sep 9, 12:51:18
    - To take one possible argument (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 9, 14:09:24
      - "Isn’t it obvious.." (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Sep 9, 15:39:09
        
        Well, without wishing to be too technical (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 9, 16:25:33
        
        Firstly, it's a judicial review... (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Sep 9, 16:49:17
        
        So I take it (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 9, 18:32:47
        
        None of your business (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Sep 9, 19:15:37
        
        Hardly shambolic (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 9, 19:35:01
        
        genuine apology (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Sep 9, 20:10:28
        
        Thanks - but to contextualise (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 9, 21:33:37
        
        Nice (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Sep 9, 21:42:11
        
        Time well spent 🤔 (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 9, 21:50:34
        
        He’s offended by the inconvenience (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 9, 21:09:45
      - I agree - curtailing of liberty should always be thoroughly questioned (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Sep 9, 14:36:43
- Human Rights (NCFC) - inutero, Sep 9, 11:26:36
  - that's a particularly shit straw man argument (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Sep 9, 11:34:12
    - Not even an argument (NCFC) - inutero, Sep 9, 11:37:02
      - more people have died of covid in the UK than were killed in the blitz (NCFC) - jampersands, Sep 9, 13:36:39
        
        They wouldn't have given a fuck .They had abit of resilience (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Sep 9, 13:38:08
      - oh that old chestnut (NCFC) - CWC, Sep 9, 11:55:11
      - Imagine how they’d have behaved during rationing (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 9, 11:50:16
        
        well ... (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 9, 12:05:45
        
        But not being allowed to meet up in groups over 6 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 9, 12:12:00
        
        its not "mass death" ffs (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Sep 9, 20:35:58
        
        the right have decided this isn't a public health crisis, or that there's any risk of (NCFC) - jampersands, Sep 9, 13:34:53
        
        Piers Corbyn is right wing? (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Sep 9, 13:36:33
- Why would they be in breach of human rights? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 9, 10:51:13
  - Because (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 9, 11:06:32
    - Why would it not be proportionate? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 9, 11:49:20
      - Maybe he goes group dogging (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Sep 9, 12:22:26
        
        6 is plenty (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 9, 14:17:20
        
        Lovely little spot in bacton FWIW... (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Sep 9, 12:59:44
        
        really .. where .... asking for friend off course (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Sep 9, 13:48:34
  - because going to footy is an inalienable human right (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 9, 11:00:49
    - Why would I go there? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 9, 11:01:55
      - Fair enough but don't think you'll find the solution on here tbf (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 9, 11:12:36
        
        Well it’s a forum yes (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 9, 12:02:07
        
        yes, shared and ignored (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 9, 12:12:06
        
        You just pretend to ignore the views 👏🏼 (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 9, 14:18:02
        
        Fuck off troll (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 9, 14:40:58

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.