We are not worse off, I really disagree with that.
Etuhu, Safri and Earnshaw all left under Grant and we still had Thorne, Hughes, Robinson and Shackell. Doherty was playing dreadful football, Croft was nowhere near the player he currently is and Marshall is a better keeper than Gallacher. Clingan and Pattison are great additions to the team and though Huckerby is missed, he'd not have been around forever anyway.
Posted By: tim berry on December 26th 2008 at 18:44:46
Message Thread
- Are we any better off.....? (NCFC) - conker, Dec 26, 17:14:50
- Yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 17:42:42
- In what way? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:44:41
- In that if Roeder hadn't have come in, we might have been worse off. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 17:52:58
- all fine, but not much to do with the question (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:19:59
- I know but I said that it's not a bad thing to not be better off when we're not worse off. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:34:16
- but what's Grant got to do with any of this? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:36:50
- What's the point in comparing Roeder to Worthington? (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:47:56
- *I meant 'whereas under Roeder' (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:35:11
- but what's Grant got to do with any of this? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:36:50
- Results wise, we're not. (NCFC) - Jono, Dec 26, 18:24:52
- Sure. Point is you don't have to be a Roeder-hater to recognise (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:35:20
- We are not worse off, I really disagree with that. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:44:46
- Sure. Point is you don't have to be a Roeder-hater to recognise (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:35:20
- I know but I said that it's not a bad thing to not be better off when we're not worse off. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:34:16
- Best Post in the Last 6 Months on this Board (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 26, 18:04:23
- I think we could have been worse off. (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 26, 18:00:14
- ^^ What he said. (NCFC) - Jono, Dec 26, 17:56:18
- all fine, but not much to do with the question (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:19:59
- In that if Roeder hadn't have come in, we might have been worse off. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 17:52:58
- In what way? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:44:41
- One bright side - at least we don't play with 4 central midfielders now (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:25:22
- Of course we're not. We just keep getting told we are! (n/m) (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:19:07
- who by? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:20:50
- Roeder and some players keep saying we're just a gnats willy away from (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:23:14
- do they? I must have repeatedly missed that. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:27:01
- Don't have any links but I am sure there are others online (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:30:41
- LOL, name one player who says "I think we are doomed because we are shit" (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 26, 18:04:02
- Don't have any links but I am sure there are others online (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:30:41
- do they? I must have repeatedly missed that. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:27:01
- Roeder and some players keep saying we're just a gnats willy away from (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:23:14
- who by? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:20:50
- You wouldn't expect us to be, would you? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:17:54
- You'd probably expect us to be worse off (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 26, 17:19:17
- So how is that Roeders fault? (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 26, 17:56:34
- Indeed. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:19:45
- You'd probably expect us to be worse off (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 26, 17:19:17
- Yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 17:42:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.