So how is that Roeders fault?

I think we are better off with the first 11 we have now over the first 11 at the infamous Plymouth game over 1 year ago.

If we still had Hucks I dont think anyone would disagree.

Outside of Hucks every player GR has got rid of or loaned out has done virtually nothing.

IF GR gets a mid table finish we would probably be over achieving.

The vast majority of teams above have more money and quality.

Blaming Roeder for strange tactics and being an arrogant dick is fair game but to blame him for having too many loans and the quality of the players is not looking at the big picture.

He is having to take a flyer on players like Carl Cort.

Of course he would rather have someone a bit more proven (better)
They dont come any cheaper than pay as you play deals.

On the basis of play this year most people agree that we should be a little highre in the table but frankly not much.
We are a long way from chasing a playoff place.

Posted By: usacanary on December 26th 2008 at 17:56:34

Message Thread

Are we any better off.....? (NCFC) - conker, Dec 26, 17:14:50
- Yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 17:42:42
  - In what way? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:44:41
    - In that if Roeder hadn't have come in, we might have been worse off. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 17:52:58
      - all fine, but not much to do with the question (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:19:59
        
        I know but I said that it's not a bad thing to not be better off when we're not worse off. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:34:16
        
        but what's Grant got to do with any of this? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:36:50
        
        What's the point in comparing Roeder to Worthington? (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:47:56
        
        *I meant 'whereas under Roeder' (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:35:11
        
        Results wise, we're not. (NCFC) - Jono, Dec 26, 18:24:52
        
        Sure. Point is you don't have to be a Roeder-hater to recognise (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:35:20
        
        We are not worse off, I really disagree with that. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:44:46
      - Best Post in the Last 6 Months on this Board (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 26, 18:04:23
      - I think we could have been worse off. (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 26, 18:00:14
      - ^^ What he said. (NCFC) - Jono, Dec 26, 17:56:18
- One bright side - at least we don't play with 4 central midfielders now (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:25:22
- Of course we're not. We just keep getting told we are! (n/m) (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:19:07
  - who by? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:20:50
    - Roeder and some players keep saying we're just a gnats willy away from (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:23:14
      - do they? I must have repeatedly missed that. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:27:01
        
        Don't have any links but I am sure there are others online (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:30:41
        
        LOL, name one player who says "I think we are doomed because we are shit" (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 26, 18:04:02
- You wouldn't expect us to be, would you? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:17:54
  - You'd probably expect us to be worse off (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 26, 17:19:17
    - So how is that Roeders fault? (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 26, 17:56:34
    - Indeed. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:19:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.