all fine, but not much to do with the question
ie - none of that suggests we're now better off than at the time of that previous Palace game, does it?
Posted By: Tricky Hawes on December 26th 2008 at 18:19:59
Message Thread
- Are we any better off.....? (NCFC) - conker, Dec 26, 17:14:50
- Yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 17:42:42
- In what way? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:44:41
- In that if Roeder hadn't have come in, we might have been worse off. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 17:52:58
- all fine, but not much to do with the question (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:19:59
- I know but I said that it's not a bad thing to not be better off when we're not worse off. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:34:16
- but what's Grant got to do with any of this? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:36:50
- What's the point in comparing Roeder to Worthington? (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:47:56
- *I meant 'whereas under Roeder' (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:35:11
- but what's Grant got to do with any of this? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:36:50
- Results wise, we're not. (NCFC) - Jono, Dec 26, 18:24:52
- Sure. Point is you don't have to be a Roeder-hater to recognise (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:35:20
- We are not worse off, I really disagree with that. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:44:46
- Sure. Point is you don't have to be a Roeder-hater to recognise (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:35:20
- I know but I said that it's not a bad thing to not be better off when we're not worse off. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 18:34:16
- Best Post in the Last 6 Months on this Board (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 26, 18:04:23
- I think we could have been worse off. (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 26, 18:00:14
- ^^ What he said. (NCFC) - Jono, Dec 26, 17:56:18
- all fine, but not much to do with the question (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 18:19:59
- In that if Roeder hadn't have come in, we might have been worse off. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 17:52:58
- In what way? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:44:41
- One bright side - at least we don't play with 4 central midfielders now (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:25:22
- Of course we're not. We just keep getting told we are! (n/m) (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:19:07
- who by? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:20:50
- Roeder and some players keep saying we're just a gnats willy away from (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:23:14
- do they? I must have repeatedly missed that. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:27:01
- Don't have any links but I am sure there are others online (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:30:41
- LOL, name one player who says "I think we are doomed because we are shit" (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 26, 18:04:02
- Don't have any links but I am sure there are others online (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:30:41
- do they? I must have repeatedly missed that. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:27:01
- Roeder and some players keep saying we're just a gnats willy away from (NCFC) - bowfront1, Dec 26, 17:23:14
- who by? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:20:50
- You wouldn't expect us to be, would you? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:17:54
- You'd probably expect us to be worse off (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 26, 17:19:17
- So how is that Roeders fault? (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 26, 17:56:34
- Indeed. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 26, 17:19:45
- You'd probably expect us to be worse off (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 26, 17:19:17
- Yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 26, 17:42:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.