These aspects are often ignored, we apparently just let go a brilliant player at the top
of his game
That's the extreme of the moaning I can't handle, because he was far from that a lot of the time last season
Posted By: pants on August 13th 2008 at 10:07:23
Message Thread
- The Hucks debate............ (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 08:09:07
- sorry, but.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 13, 08:50:02
- These aspects are often ignored, we apparently just let go a brilliant player at the top (NCFC) - pants, Aug 13, 10:07:23
- It was probably the right time for him to go (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 10:16:52
- Hucks on less wages from the bench as an impact sub would be an excellent option (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 09:08:14
- wouldn't work (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 13, 09:26:48
- Yeah thats probably right actually (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 09:31:37
- Hoorah..........that would suggest we've had a shot?? (n/m) (NCFC) - capecodcarman, Aug 13, 09:39:39
- Yeah thats probably right actually (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 09:31:37
- wouldn't work (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 13, 09:26:48
- Spot On..... (n/m) (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Aug 13, 09:07:22
- These aspects are often ignored, we apparently just let go a brilliant player at the top (NCFC) - pants, Aug 13, 10:07:23
- Totally agree. Brave new world and all that but Roeder doesn't know what shape it is yet! (NCFC) - TheHoolahanElement, Aug 13, 08:48:37
- Oh and another thing.... (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 08:10:23
- sorry, but.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 13, 08:50:02
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.