The Hucks debate............

Ok we did not play as a great team with him, Ok he was getting on and getting injured a lot and was on a big wage.

BUT

- Fans payed to be entertained, and he sure did that

- He could dig us out of a hole with one piece of individual brilliance

- Our players and the opposition respected him

- He had electric pace, which causes any opposition problems.

Perhaps it was the right time for him to go, but we havent got a player in teh squad now who could do all of the things I just mentioned, In fact we havent got 11 players who can do the things Hucks could between them.

Posted By: DiscoDaleGordon on August 13th 2008 at 08:09:07

Message Thread

The Hucks debate............ (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 08:09:07
- sorry, but.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 13, 08:50:02
  - These aspects are often ignored, we apparently just let go a brilliant player at the top (NCFC) - pants, Aug 13, 10:07:23
    - It was probably the right time for him to go (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 10:16:52
  - Hucks on less wages from the bench as an impact sub would be an excellent option (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 09:08:14
    - wouldn't work (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 13, 09:26:48
      - Yeah thats probably right actually (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 09:31:37
        
        Hoorah..........that would suggest we've had a shot?? (n/m) (NCFC) - capecodcarman, Aug 13, 09:39:39
  - Spot On..... (n/m) (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Aug 13, 09:07:22
- Totally agree. Brave new world and all that but Roeder doesn't know what shape it is yet! (NCFC) - TheHoolahanElement, Aug 13, 08:48:37
- Oh and another thing.... (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 13, 08:10:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.