The irony is................
its a completely realistic analogy.
Professionals only "gamble" when they have the edge not the casino.
It isn`t really gambling.
In my example you would have had a 0.5% edge over me.
That doesnt mean you are certain to win over 100 spins.
Over 100,000 spins you are pretty certain to win.
Just like the example.
Casinos don't gamble as such. They have the math of the games/long run on their side.
But its possible in the right situation for every game in the casino to become beatable.
Posted By: usacanary on January 11th 2009 at 20:47:45
Message Thread
- Gambling talk below. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:02:17
- Would love to reply about this, and other stuff (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 20:12:44
- Your feud/bickering/what ever you call it with SCC is ruining this board, dont you realise (Betting) - Yellalee, Jan 11, 20:19:40
- I actually agree, but as nothing is ever done to rectify his bahaviour (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 20:37:58
- I look forward to all that then. (n/m) (Betting) - lurd, Jan 11, 20:44:31
- what was happening yesterday? (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:39:20
- I said we lacked a big striker (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 20:47:56
- ah righty ho (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:49:15
- This, is where your post of, "you take this board too seriously" (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 20:57:04
- I think the difference is (Betting) - Holden Caulfield, Jan 11, 21:34:13
- it's only an internet messageboard (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:36:31
- I know - it's only light-hearted (Betting) - Holden Caulfield, Jan 11, 21:37:59
- it's only an internet messageboard (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:36:31
- "they're" (n/m) (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:59:57
- i think you do yes (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:57:39
- lol, feed feed feed (n/m) (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 20:59:03
- well you clearly do (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:00:01
- Shall we just leave it there? (n/m) (Betting) - BerlinCanary, Jan 11, 21:03:04
- I've just explained above, if you can't understand, go to nightschool or summit (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 21:02:56
- Just leave it!!!! (n/m) (Betting) - HoofinHughes, Jan 11, 21:01:40
- well you clearly do (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 21:00:01
- lol, feed feed feed (n/m) (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 20:59:03
- I think the difference is (Betting) - Holden Caulfield, Jan 11, 21:34:13
- This, is where your post of, "you take this board too seriously" (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 20:57:04
- ah righty ho (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:49:15
- You didnt last long lol (Betting) - HoofinHughes, Jan 11, 20:42:47
- lol indeed (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:44:18
- bitch (n/m) (Betting) - lurd, Jan 11, 20:45:22
- you weren't on either... (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:46:05
- bitch (n/m) (Betting) - lurd, Jan 11, 20:47:15
- and to think he defended you (n/m) (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:49:21
- Did he? (n/m) (Betting) - lurd, Jan 11, 20:50:16
- sorry, got confused (n/m) (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:55:14
- owned (n/m) (Betting) - HoofinHughes, Jan 11, 20:55:35
- sorry, got confused (n/m) (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:55:14
- Did he? (n/m) (Betting) - lurd, Jan 11, 20:50:16
- and to think he defended you (n/m) (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:49:21
- bitch (n/m) (Betting) - lurd, Jan 11, 20:47:15
- you weren't on either... (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:46:05
- bitch (n/m) (Betting) - lurd, Jan 11, 20:45:22
- lol indeed (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:44:18
- I said we lacked a big striker (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 20:47:56
- Well said yella (Betting) - HoofinHughes, Jan 11, 20:23:51
- HoofinHughes (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:25:18
- Thanks man, i just dont see the point fighting with him no more (Betting) - HoofinHughes, Jan 11, 20:27:27
- i will try to follow your example (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:28:13
- Beware, he'll try and bait you loads (Betting) - HoofinHughes, Jan 11, 20:30:19
- See - you are such a fucking troll though, arent you? (Betting) - Yellalee, Jan 11, 20:34:57
- Spot on Lee - bang on the money (Betting) - The Judge, Jan 11, 20:49:34
- Eh? (Betting) - HoofinHughes, Jan 11, 20:38:21
- stop stoking the fire (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:35:28
- indeed (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:30:59
- See - you are such a fucking troll though, arent you? (Betting) - Yellalee, Jan 11, 20:34:57
- Beware, he'll try and bait you loads (Betting) - HoofinHughes, Jan 11, 20:30:19
- i will try to follow your example (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:28:13
- Thanks man, i just dont see the point fighting with him no more (Betting) - HoofinHughes, Jan 11, 20:27:27
- agreed (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:24:39
- HoofinHughes (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:25:18
- nope i'm here (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:20:37
- I actually agree, but as nothing is ever done to rectify his bahaviour (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 20:37:58
- you need to be arrogant to make it pay (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:19:26
- Im guessing you didn't play Charlotte +3.5 then. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:21:43
- i rarely touch yank sport (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:22:55
- Im guessing you didn't play Charlotte +3.5 then. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:21:43
- if you'd love to reply (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:15:04
- erm yes i am (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:18:41
- see below "biased wheels" (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:17:05
- Your feud/bickering/what ever you call it with SCC is ruining this board, dont you realise (Betting) - Yellalee, Jan 11, 20:19:40
- 13 against the bank (Betting) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 11, 20:05:41
- 13 against the bank sounds pure bullshit BTW. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:26:01
- it might sound like bullshit but its supposedly a true story (n/m) (Betting) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 11, 20:40:20
- the blackjack scam was good (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:41:37
- and if you win you get banned anyway (n/m) (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:26:41
- what are you talking about? (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:32:44
- if you're a consistent winner vs the casino (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:33:48
- doesn`t that mean.................. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:38:36
- well of course it's success (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:40:38
- The biggest edges in sportsbetting are.............. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:49:32
- my edge is tennis (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:50:38
- The biggest edges in sportsbetting are.............. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:49:32
- well of course it's success (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:40:38
- doesn`t that mean.................. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:38:36
- if you're a consistent winner vs the casino (Betting) - SCC 28, Jan 11, 20:33:48
- what are you talking about? (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:32:44
- it might sound like bullshit but its supposedly a true story (n/m) (Betting) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 11, 20:40:20
- Biased wheels (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:16:14
- what's that Worzel? (n/m) (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:08:37
- it's a book about a method to beat roulette tables (Betting) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 11, 20:10:43
- interesting, might have to get that (n/m) (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:13:18
- I recommend it. Very interesting stuff and as I say, he was still hiring a few years back (n/m) (Betting) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 11, 20:14:20
- the bit at the end that says (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:17:33
- I'm sure you can get a copy on Amazon (Betting) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 11, 20:24:18
- the best time to walk away from a roulette wheel is (Betting) - Tombs, Jan 11, 20:21:52
- really so what if.............. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:30:07
- that isn't a realistic analogy is it (Betting) - Tombs, Jan 11, 20:35:19
- The irony is................ (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:47:45
- and it is perfectly possible for Norwich to win the Champions League (Betting) - Tombs, Jan 11, 20:57:18
- My mistake............ (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 21:12:31
- and it is perfectly possible for Norwich to win the Champions League (Betting) - Tombs, Jan 11, 20:57:18
- The irony is................ (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:47:45
- that isn't a realistic analogy is it (Betting) - Tombs, Jan 11, 20:35:19
- is the correct answer. (n/m) (Betting) - Yellalee, Jan 11, 20:23:10
- for most people yes. (n/m) (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:30:42
- I agree with that (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:23:01
- really so what if.............. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:30:07
- the bit at the end that says (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:17:33
- I recommend it. Very interesting stuff and as I say, he was still hiring a few years back (n/m) (Betting) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 11, 20:14:20
- interesting, might have to get that (n/m) (Betting) - Charles21, Jan 11, 20:13:18
- it's a book about a method to beat roulette tables (Betting) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 11, 20:10:43
- 13 against the bank sounds pure bullshit BTW. (Betting) - usacanary, Jan 11, 20:26:01
- Would love to reply about this, and other stuff (Betting) - pants, Jan 11, 20:12:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.