I’d take issue with one part.
“history now tells us he wasn't a very good manager at all“ - that’s a bit harsh. He was very good for us and Colchester, didn’t do badly at Wycombe either. Villa was a hard one - it’s taken years and a lot of money to partly turn that ship around. Wolves the same, and Stoke aren’t really seeing any kind of turnaround yet, despite O’Neil starting quite well. As for where he is now, I’d defy anyone to go there and make a success of it in any less than five years, so I can see the logic of his contract.
Posted By: APB on March 4th 2020 at 10:41:06
Message Thread
- Lambert and the Mysterious Case of the Five Year Contract (NCFC) - Chopper, Mar 4, 09:26:56
- there are break clauses dependent on performance (NCFC) - pab, Mar 4, 14:55:43
- Needs paragraphs, so for that reason, I'm OUT (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 4, 11:15:09
- I’d take issue with one part. (NCFC) - APB, Mar 4, 10:41:06
- At the time he was given the contract, their form was (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 4, 09:42:32
- That is what makes it so mysterious (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 4, 09:50:03
- I agree Lambert played Evans whilst his stock was high. Just as he threatened to leave us (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 4, 09:37:26
- Tbf hacked choppers account. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Mar 4, 09:28:36
- The Big Chopper (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 4, 09:42:12
- Jumbo,Garrald etc etc... (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Mar 4, 09:46:08
- The Big Chopper (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 4, 09:42:12
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.