Interesting thread on twtd perhaps relevant to our new business model
It seems the sc*m have lost a kid from their academy, described by Klug as the best kid he's ever worked with, to Man City and are getting circa £1m in return.
They are obviously gutted as he's never even played for them and now never will do so.
Reading this made me think about our new "model" which is obviously geared towards bringing players through from the academy, creating a pathway for them and then selling for decent fees. It occurred to me that this new trend for big clubs to make "academy signings" is a potential threat/risk to that model as it appears the bigger clubs are increasingly trying to snap up promising kids at a younger age (often by bribing their parents) and thereby presumably avoiding having to pay multi millions for them when they are under contract at 17+.
I know bigger teams poaching youngsters has always happened before to a degree (like that kid we lost to Man U (or was it City) a couple of years ago) but with the likes of Madders, the Murphys, Sessesgnon etc now all attracting 8 figure fees I can see this sort of thing happening more and more and wonder if the FA will need to step in and try and do something to stop/discourage it?
Posted By: Jim on June 29th 2018 at 12:08:55
Message Thread
- Interesting thread on twtd perhaps relevant to our new business model (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 29, 12:08:55
- I am guessing that none of the muppets on twtd (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 29, 13:18:57
- what exactly do you think we'll be doing to clubs below us? (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 29, 13:13:55
- I’m not criticising the club over this (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 29, 13:36:48
- "mandatory “sell on” fee for players who’ve been developed at a club for more than x year" (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 29, 14:08:36
- No that’s the compensation they get. I don’t know if the tribunal (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 29, 14:11:17
- Ah gotcha (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 29, 13:51:17
- there are plenty of rules in place (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 29, 13:48:55
- "mandatory “sell on” fee for players who’ve been developed at a club for more than x year" (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 29, 14:08:36
- James Maddison (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 29, 13:25:00
- I’m not criticising the club over this (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 29, 13:36:48
- The academy... (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Jun 29, 12:32:32
- "that kid we lost to Man U " (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, Jun 29, 12:16:54
- Was Kallum Mooniaruk wasn't it, not Louis Blois. I remember because he was AWESOME (NCFC) - megson, Jun 29, 14:59:34
- That’s why it’s imperative to have category 1... (NCFC) - loz, Jun 29, 12:15:57
- Can you not? Is there a rule to stop it happening then (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 29, 12:17:06
- Pretty sure it’s much much harder (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jun 29, 12:22:46
- I think there is a fixed compensation formula for players moving (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 29, 12:25:38
- I don’t think it’s that simplistic when players are attached ... (NCFC) - loz, Jun 29, 12:38:43
- Hope you are right. I think the issue is the window before they sign a pro contract (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 29, 12:54:51
- I don’t think it’s that simplistic when players are attached ... (NCFC) - loz, Jun 29, 12:30:23
- I don’t think it’s that simplistic when players are attached ... (NCFC) - loz, Jun 29, 12:38:43
- I think there is a fixed compensation formula for players moving (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 29, 12:25:38
- Pretty sure it’s much much harder (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jun 29, 12:22:46
- Can you not? Is there a rule to stop it happening then (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 29, 12:17:06
- Isn’t that what happened with Angus? (n/m) (NCFC) - Adster, Jun 29, 12:14:20
- Kind of although I think that was more due to us sacking his dad and (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 29, 12:16:38
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.