why 'should' it have been?

I can see why people would like it to have been, but I also see the counter argument that unexpected things like cup runs should be used as a free for all to give new attendees the chance to go (in the hope they get the bug). its hardly something special like a semi or a final that the regulars are missing out on.

If it's only ever the regulars that get the chances to go, it'll only ever be the regulars that go.

Posted By: CWC on September 29th 2017 at 10:56:21

Message Thread

OK I've decided to put my strict hat on (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 29, 10:14:32
- Is the correct answer. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Sep 29, 12:22:37
- Bang on. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Sep 29, 12:05:01
- 5k tickets available they should of let 'regulars' (however that is defined) (NCFC) - maidstoneyellow, Sep 29, 11:36:22
- Your two paragraphs appear contradict each other (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:41:02
  - why 'should' it have been? (NCFC) - CWC, Sep 29, 10:56:21
    - and yes I did mean the away ticket scheme (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 29, 11:10:42
- I love that hat (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Sep 29, 10:40:38
- Glory hunting post ^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Sep 29, 10:32:51
- vimto (n/m) (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Sep 29, 10:20:44
- YES. This. (NCFC) - bird table, Sep 29, 10:19:43
- 👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Sep 29, 10:17:16
- 👍👏👏👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Sep 29, 10:16:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.