Your two paragraphs appear contradict each other
People have "joined the away scheme" by accumulating points. Or do you mean the away season ticket scheme?
Its pretty obvious here that the away priority scheme should have been used. there still would have been 4000 or so tickets out of the original allocation available for general sale even if the top 1000 points holders had a couple of days priority.
Posted By: Jim on September 29th 2017 at 10:41:02
Message Thread
- OK I've decided to put my strict hat on (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 29, 10:14:32
- Is the correct answer. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Sep 29, 12:22:37
- Bang on. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Sep 29, 12:05:01
- 5k tickets available they should of let 'regulars' (however that is defined) (NCFC) - maidstoneyellow, Sep 29, 11:36:22
- Your two paragraphs appear contradict each other (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:41:02
- why 'should' it have been? (NCFC) - CWC, Sep 29, 10:56:21
- and yes I did mean the away ticket scheme (NCFC) - camcan, Sep 29, 11:10:42
- why 'should' it have been? (NCFC) - CWC, Sep 29, 10:56:21
- I love that hat (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Sep 29, 10:40:38
- Glory hunting post ^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Sep 29, 10:32:51
- vimto (n/m) (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Sep 29, 10:20:44
- YES. This. (NCFC) - bird table, Sep 29, 10:19:43
- 👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Sep 29, 10:17:16
- 👍👏👏👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Sep 29, 10:16:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.