But Lambert wouldn't leave our best player out...
...with the sole purpose of undermining said player's position as talasmanic fan favourite.
The man is/was a mental case.
Posted By: Rofl_Harris on July 12th 2011 at 11:31:07
Message Thread
- Didn't Roeder once say that Neyul would never manage 'a team older than 10 years old'? (NCFC) - Clipper, Jul 12, 11:08:12
- Didn't Neyul bad mouth Roeder with a poor use of airtime? (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 11:19:31
- You wouldn't let it lie would you? (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jul 12, 12:55:19
- At the time I think we'd lost once or twice in 15 matches (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 13:49:22
- "I am a big fan of Huckerby's, but it's results that count and it's results that the manag (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 11:24:47
- Exactly. Adams basically said the he would've played Hucks, but couldn't argue with Roeder (NCFC) - Clipper, Jul 12, 11:30:52
- yep a low point in the club's history (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jul 12, 11:32:20
- lol at saying he and hucks got on well (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jul 12, 11:30:23
- It was happening though, regardless of results (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 11:28:56
- yes, how very fucking dare he do his job - in expressing a view - regardless of results... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 11:31:44
- But Lambert wouldn't leave our best player out... (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Jul 12, 11:31:07
- Huckerby wasn't our best player at that time. He would set up his deckchair (NCFC) - TransitVanBeethoven, Jul 12, 11:48:33
- "Poor imitation of a footballer" (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 12, 11:58:28
- Of course, silly me.. (NCFC) - Rofl_Harris, Jul 12, 11:50:11
- It is true to state that Hucks didn't really fit into that system. (NCFC) - lurd, Jul 12, 11:57:59
- EXACTLY. ^^^^ What lambert wouldn't "stand for" is the state our squad was in. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Jul 12, 14:06:33
- That's what's been good about the last couple of seasons. Proper funding (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 14:22:14
- Bollocks (NCFC) - Malkys Head, Jul 12, 14:32:26
- The loans stated in the annual report included Gunn's spending (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 14:37:54
- I would guess that Lambert spent less last season that Roeder did. (n/m) (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 12, 14:35:48
- I doubt it. We must have shifted about 10m last season (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 14:37:00
- Explain how you reach those figures and apply the same Maths/Guess work (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 12, 14:47:07
- it's ok, what with us being a PLC we have to publish our accounts (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 15:10:54
- Twisted argument starter (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:24:19
- / (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 15:28:03
- Well done (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:28:42
- (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 15:28:17
- balls indeed (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:33:46
- (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 15:41:07
- (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:44:19
- (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 15:47:43
- (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:44:19
- (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 15:41:07
- balls indeed (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:33:46
- / (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 15:28:03
- Twisted argument starter (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:24:19
- It's just my opinion on what we spent (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 14:53:43
- I agree that Lambert wouldnt tolerate it either (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 12, 15:11:42
- Can draw various paralells there imo (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:22:08
- Officially there's 2m here too (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:35:26
- My general view though would be (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:41:59
- Officially there's 2m here too (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:35:26
- Can draw various paralells there imo (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 15:22:08
- I agree that Lambert wouldnt tolerate it either (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 12, 15:11:42
- it's ok, what with us being a PLC we have to publish our accounts (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 15:10:54
- Explain how you reach those figures and apply the same Maths/Guess work (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 12, 14:47:07
- I doubt it. We must have shifted about 10m last season (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 14:37:00
- Bollocks (NCFC) - Malkys Head, Jul 12, 14:32:26
- That's what's been good about the last couple of seasons. Proper funding (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 14:22:14
- EXACTLY. ^^^^ What lambert wouldn't "stand for" is the state our squad was in. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Jul 12, 14:06:33
- It is true to state that Hucks didn't really fit into that system. (NCFC) - lurd, Jul 12, 11:57:59
- Huckerby wasn't our best player at that time. He would set up his deckchair (NCFC) - TransitVanBeethoven, Jul 12, 11:48:33
- Oh, and thanks for the swear words (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 11:30:01
- stick the fucking swear filter on if you're that fucking precious (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 12, 11:32:21
- Exactly. Adams basically said the he would've played Hucks, but couldn't argue with Roeder (NCFC) - Clipper, Jul 12, 11:30:52
- You wouldn't let it lie would you? (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Jul 12, 12:55:19
- scum (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jul 12, 11:12:36
- his managerial record is second to none, especially (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Jul 12, 11:29:43
- A team OF KIDS that should say... (n/m) (NCFC) - Clipper, Jul 12, 11:09:11
- Didn't Neyul bad mouth Roeder with a poor use of airtime? (NCFC) - pants, Jul 12, 11:19:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.