I think I understand now

I see: I'm at fault for expressing my opinion on the Grant appointment - childishly optimistic and hopelessly wrong I freely admit. Fair enough you nailed me. Problem is I can't see that my continued support for the previous manager counts as "a sarcastic, sour-faced putdown" .

And again - and I can't be bothered to check - but my recollection is that most of my blog deals with what I perceive to be the faults of Doncaster and, before him, Worthington two men who, with the assistance of Grant put Norwich City "in its worst position since 1960". "Sarcastic, sour-faced putdowns" they may be, but justified I think.

And as for thinking you've got "a bee in your bonnet" no, never crossed my mind. As for you talking 95% bollocks, well we all do - as I recall hardly anyone wanted Roeder, and no-one wanted Worthington, but you do it so less succinctly than anyone else.

Posted By: The King of Prussia, Nov 6, 01:15:55