The problem is

the other side won't engage in debate. Examples:
1. On more than one occasion we have been told by the club that stability is important. Worthington takes the completely opposite view and acts on it. No-one will tell me why we still employ him when he is undermining club policy.
2. I have asked repeatedly why it is that Worthington has not reached his "sell-by date" when other, greater, managers had. The answer I was given by a Worthy-inner was that Saunders was much older than Worthington. In fact he was younger.
3. Again, we were told on here that our current league position is far superior to anything we could have achieved before Worthington arrived. In fact we finished 9th and 12th in the two previous seasons.

It is difficult to debate with, or indeed have any time at all for, people who either dodge the issues, or simply lie in support of their position. It is sad to see that the board are now behaving in the same way with their pathetic misrepresentation of the West Ham situation.

Posted By: The King of Prussia, Mar 9, 10:09:34