"blind faith" of the worthy outers

The difference with "worthy inners" and "worthy outers" is that the later seem unprepared to listen to any arguement or viewpoint from the otherside. Where "worthy inners" tend accept many of the critisms of this season merely are unsure that sacking a manger who has a better record then most at this level (fact) is perhaps not the best way forward at this point. The "worthy outers" however seem to not even want to consider any reasoned arguement. The reaction to Delias and Michael statement has shocked me even on this cynical site. You might not argue with some of their conclusions but their arguement is rational and diplomatic and heart felt from genuine supporters. To call for the sack of Delia to me shows some sort of "blind faith" in the worthy out campaign. Ok worthy has made some bad decisions this season I'll grant you that and deserves some critism - although some of the things said on here are radicolous - but sacking Delia??!! I'm not sure your doing your campaign any good with the average supporter - Worthy you may get support Delia no. Without her we 10th this season would be an achievement in the league below!! She is and through and through supporter - don't you think that this campaign is getting a little bit of hand?

Posted By: greendude, Mar 9, 09:29:15