I don't disagree with a lot of that,

I just think for everything that people say about Hamilton, Worthington has easily mirrored more than once, and in some cases more spectacularly

I understand in hindsight you can look at players like Vanazza Moore and Healy and comment. But those players had immediate effect on the clubs they went to and success followed two of them to an extent

Even when worthy came here, he was given 2 mill to spend, he sorted out the left back position immediately, but to a cost of half a million for Drury. Then followed Rivers who I don't regret us signing, and was useful when on fire. Emblen I will never comprehend, and that was the first time I questioned worthington

You were right, he then introduced McVeigh and Steeno, bizarre that Squiz was the bright spot when he took over and is the bright spot this season, but is surplus to requirements dispite his long service to the club. I thought these were the sorts of players worthy likes

Even after that that money was spent, norwich nervously took on the division with a nothing squad. We all remember bricking it when sutch played left back against preston

I look back and wonder though. If Hamilton could have had his signings, Moore, Harper, Holt, I know ashley cole was ambitious but it was only a loan request, it could have sparked a different type of career

At the end of the day, he was ex ipswich, and never stood a chance

You can't blame the current board for over protecting worthy when people were excrutiatingly ott to get Hamilton out

I've had my stance all season about Worthington, but if it means people to get nasty and do the club bad, then I don't think I like it. That doesn't mean I think bad of those doing the protests, the club are asking for it

I just find the whole situation completley unavoidable if the club could mediate with the fans and sort this out

In reality though, they don't want to sack worthington so battle lines are drawn

Posted By: pants, Feb 8, 01:22:14