it was both

if he had the results that fact he made some strange decisions and was arrogant would've been forgiven

if he had the crowd on his side, by not being such a c**t, he would've been given more time to get the results right

Posted By: Ralf Scrampton on January 14th 2009 at 20:28:54

Message Thread

It wasn't the results that did for Roeder... (NCFC) - The Judge, Jan 14, 20:19:59
- Good post, and spot on imo (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 14, 20:38:37
  - Bum slaps with wet towels all round (n/m) (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Jan 14, 20:59:02
  - You guys (n/m) (NCFC) - The Judge, Jan 14, 20:52:01
  - No, YOU'RE SCC. We've been over this. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 14, 20:39:54
  - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:39:28
- it was both (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 14, 20:28:54
  - Yep - I would say 60% approach, 40% results (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 14, 20:31:11
    - 15-85 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:31:43
      - Pareto principle... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Jan 14, 20:34:32
        
        we need to ask delia (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:35:06
      - 30-70 (n/m) (NCFC) - The Judge, Jan 14, 20:34:12
      - Well i'm right, and you are wrong. And i wont hear a word said against it. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 14, 20:32:49
        
        too much pressure! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:34:12
- I said much the same in response to Buckscanary below. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 14, 20:28:04
- An excellent post. The incident at the AGM sticks in my mind... (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Jan 14, 20:25:17
  - but if that was a sackable offence (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:26:05
    - I think his sacking would have been the thing the board wanted least for financial reasons (n/m) (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Jan 14, 20:29:08
      - businessman prob paid him off (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:29:49
- Me too - a complete absence of dithering, especially given it's January (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Jan 14, 20:24:34
  - My feelings entirely! (NCFC) - The Judge, Jan 14, 20:25:59
- get over it you fucking roeder lover (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Jan 14, 20:23:31
  - Go fuck a pig you retard (n/m) (NCFC) - The Judge, Jan 14, 20:24:26
    - hes gone and you backed him right till the end-what a cunt (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Jan 14, 20:27:14
      - i'm not sure he did tbh (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:34:37
      - Nothing makes you are happy (NCFC) - The Judge, Jan 14, 20:33:40
        
        aww cheers (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:38:02
        
        meow! if you feel that strongly go and protest to get the cunt back (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Jan 14, 20:36:58
        
        You didnt understand that, either, did you? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 14, 20:39:40
        
        SUPER GLENN ROEDER (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Jan 14, 20:43:16
        
        i just don't think he read it tbf! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:42:14
        
        Guess what selwyn (NCFC) - The Judge, Jan 14, 20:37:58
      - Guys... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Jan 14, 20:29:56
    - poor (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Jan 14, 20:26:26
    - stop flirting guys (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:25:09
- of course it was results (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:22:06
  - Our recent form is not a sackable offence in isolation (n/m) (NCFC) - The Judge, Jan 14, 20:23:47
    - wtf (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:24:38
      - and everyone was calling him to be sacked last night (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:27:09
        
        If he wasn't so arrogant and scarcastic and rubbed just about everybody up the wrong way (NCFC) - double hipness, Jan 14, 20:31:10
        
        i thought the fans were far too good on him tbh (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:32:25
        
        that's true to an extent (NCFC) - double hipness, Jan 14, 20:37:29
        
        yes probably (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 14, 20:40:21

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.