He did

he desperately wanted to do well and was so pleased to be Norwich manager. He had time for everyone. He just wasn't ready, or good enough.

Roeder is the polar opposite. Apart from not being good enough.

Posted By: duke of york on January 14th 2009 at 10:05:17

Message Thread

Roeder summed up in one of the opening paragraphs in Waghorns (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 14, 09:37:54
- If you READ the article, you'll see that he doesnt actually metion Spillane or Martin (NCFC) - Yellow_Monkey, Jan 14, 10:15:09
  - Even worse..why put read in capitals? (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 14, 10:35:17
- What, you mean use man management skills?! (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 14, 09:39:07
  - Who had worse man management skills? Grant or Roeder? (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 14, 09:41:32
    - Roeder for me...problem with Grant he appeared to want (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 14, 09:53:49
      - Grant was at least a decent bloke (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 14, 09:59:49
        
        On the occassions I met him he appeared to have a lot of time for the fans (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jan 14, 10:01:29
        
        He did (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 14, 10:05:17
    - I think the players had more respect for Grant (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jan 14, 09:43:18
  - Cureton is one of the few remaining players the fans can relate to (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Jan 14, 09:41:16
  - Exactly...he appears to have very little (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 14, 09:40:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.