oh right, looking at the series of posts
I thought this was about David Benley
Posted By: Charles21 on January 8th 2009 at 19:45:55
Message Thread
- Interesting article on the Poor Man's Lee Sharpe right here. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:05:19
- just realised i've been trolled by otto!!!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:30:24
- How is it trolling? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:32:27
- if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck and sounds like a duck... (NCFC) - Bullet, Jan 8, 19:35:55
- it was to stir up trouble (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:34:23
- I had no intention of stirring up trouble - I just wanted to draw attention to it. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:37:05
- You are Pants and I claim my ?5!! (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 8, 19:36:01
- haha (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:36:36
- OWNED!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:38:48
- but it was done with sarcasm to make the point (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:40:25
- WotB Poll: Who thinks SCC 28 has been OWNED throughout this entire thread? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:42:05
- YES (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:48:34
- Yes (although, as said above, I'm not sure what it means) (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 8, 19:45:36
- maybe it means trolled... (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:46:03
- Well if that's the case, I'm permanently "owned":-( (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 8, 19:48:28
- maybe it means trolled... (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:46:03
- cos most hate bentley (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:44:54
- Got what wrong? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:47:20
- his ability (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:48:45
- You want us to bid ?15m for Bentley? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:06:12
- we don't have that sort of cash (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:11:14
- Stop going on about it then (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:15:15
- we don't have that sort of cash (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:11:14
- You want us to bid ?15m for Bentley? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:06:12
- his ability (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:48:45
- Got what wrong? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:47:20
- A shambles would be too kind (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:44:45
- WotB Poll: Who thinks SCC 28 has been OWNED throughout this entire thread? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:42:05
- but it was done with sarcasm to make the point (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:40:25
- OWNED!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:38:48
- haha (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:36:36
- How is it trolling? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:32:27
- let's hope he gets better soon (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:21:16
- Like when we played Ashton with a head fracture? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:22:01
- that's an injury not an illness (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:23:42
- Yeah, which is why he was subbed off after half an hour in the next game (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:26:50
- was that before he started feigning injuries (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:28:41
- The injury which delayed him playing for West Ham for 3 weeks after he signed? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:30:59
- do you like dean ashton? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:33:22
- Make your mind up, do you think he was really injured or not (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:35:33
- injured at plymouth? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:37:30
- Even though there was medical proof to back up he was injured? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:41:53
- at plymouth? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:42:24
- He was injured at Plymouth yes. Worthington said so (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:43:51
- what proof? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:45:09
- The scan, and the fact he didn't play for nearly a month afterwards? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:48:06
- what scan? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:49:24
- This one, the one where he was injured and missed a game (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:55:27
- the west ham scan was lies (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:58:57
- Can you back that up? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:00:45
- i know what happened (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:02:10
- No you don't, and you cannot handle the truth, or accept being wrong (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:09:34
- i know what happened (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:02:10
- Can you back that up? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:00:45
- the west ham scan was lies (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:58:57
- This one, the one where he was injured and missed a game (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:55:27
- what scan? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:49:24
- just admit you can't handle the turht (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:47:20
- Who *can* handle the turht? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:51:17
- rolf (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:47:30
- It's not been a good last few minutes has it? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:49:38
- The scan, and the fact he didn't play for nearly a month afterwards? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:48:06
- what proof? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:45:09
- He was injured at Plymouth yes. Worthington said so (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:43:51
- at plymouth? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:42:24
- Even though there was medical proof to back up he was injured? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:41:53
- injured at plymouth? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:37:30
- Make your mind up, do you think he was really injured or not (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:35:33
- do you like dean ashton? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:33:22
- was a great sale by us that (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:30:58
- Agree totally (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 8, 19:43:31
- So you admit you were wrong and he was injured then? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:33:12
- he was always 'injured' (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:36:05
- What are you suggesting by 'injured' please? Do you not like the truth? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:38:48
- why would I not admit it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:35:59
- soz, was a reply to scc above (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:37:39
- no probs (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:38:47
- you should have known that you cock (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:39:16
- no probs (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:38:47
- soz, was a reply to scc above (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:37:39
- he was always 'injured' (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:36:05
- indeed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:32:13
- Not really O'Neill - we only got ?750,000 for him in the end, didn't we? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:33:21
- agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:36:10
- but his career was soon over (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:35:35
- "soon"? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:39:56
- playing for them meant it was over yes (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:42:01
- owned (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:44:59
- Comprehensively so. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:57:15
- owned (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:44:59
- playing for them meant it was over yes (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:42:01
- "soon"? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:39:56
- Not really O'Neill - we only got ?750,000 for him in the end, didn't we? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:33:21
- The injury which delayed him playing for West Ham for 3 weeks after he signed? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:30:59
- was that before he started feigning injuries (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:28:41
- Yeah, which is why he was subbed off after half an hour in the next game (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:26:50
- that's an injury not an illness (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:23:42
- Like when we played Ashton with a head fracture? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:22:01
- 9th most expsensive signing in world football in 2008 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:19:29
- Looks like Harry Redknapp doesn't really want him either ... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:20:02
- a substitution hardly indicates that (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:21:38
- why is it devastating? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:24:08
- "He didn't feel well," said Redknapp. Then came the devastating caveat: "Apparently". (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:22:36
- Quite damning really, most managers would keep that in house (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:24:33
- the word apparently should be in house? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:25:54
- Does Bentley come to any of our games? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:27:42
- Or donate money to flems runs? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:28:32
- what's that got to do with anything? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:31:52
- He likes the club (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:33:47
- what's that got to do with anything? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:31:52
- Or donate money to flems runs? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:28:32
- The Word should have been kept in-house at Channel 4 - surely you agree? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:27:22
- Does Bentley come to any of our games? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:27:42
- the word apparently should be in house? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:25:54
- why is it devastating? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:24:18
- it means he doesn't believe him (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:26:38
- that's one way to interpret it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:29:40
- That's how i read it (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 8, 19:51:26
- Presumably that's why he's slapped in a bid for Stewart Downing? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:55:59
- competition for places is also a good way of giving a player a kick up the backside (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 8, 20:03:36
- ^^^ Are the same person. vvv (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 20:04:44
- OWNED!!!!!!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:05:25
- Yes you were. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 20:08:36
- unfortunately I can too (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 20:13:25
- Yes you were. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 20:08:36
- OWNED!!!!!!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:05:25
- ^^^ Are the same person. vvv (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 20:04:44
- competition is healthy (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:00:08
- competition for places is also a good way of giving a player a kick up the backside (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 8, 20:03:36
- spot on (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:52:58
- Presumably that's why he's slapped in a bid for Stewart Downing? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:55:59
- What a load of bollocks (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:32:05
- Benters seems the kind of guy that needs (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:31:29
- I think he probably just needs his ego massaged. (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 8, 19:33:44
- It's certainly not uncommon for David Boo-entley. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:35:03
- I think he probably just needs his ego massaged. (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 8, 19:33:44
- That's how i read it (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 8, 19:51:26
- that's one way to interpret it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:29:40
- It suggests he thinks Bentley is lying to him. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:25:32
- it means he doesn't believe him (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:26:38
- Quite damning really, most managers would keep that in house (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:24:33
- a substitution hardly indicates that (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:21:38
- Looks like Harry Redknapp doesn't really want him either ... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:20:02
- put in a bid glenn (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:16:10
- hahahahaha (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:06:46
- just realised i've been trolled by otto!!!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:30:24
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.