It suggests he thinks Bentley is lying to him.
Most managers don't tend to put up with that sort of thing, and as managers, they can just turf out the player if they're dissatisfied.
If you give me your address, I can post you a diagram?
Posted By: Ottosson Foxtrot on January 8th 2009 at 19:25:32
Message Thread
- Interesting article on the Poor Man's Lee Sharpe right here. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:05:19
- just realised i've been trolled by otto!!!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:30:24
- How is it trolling? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:32:27
- if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck and sounds like a duck... (NCFC) - Bullet, Jan 8, 19:35:55
- it was to stir up trouble (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:34:23
- I had no intention of stirring up trouble - I just wanted to draw attention to it. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:37:05
- You are Pants and I claim my ?5!! (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 8, 19:36:01
- haha (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:36:36
- OWNED!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:38:48
- but it was done with sarcasm to make the point (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:40:25
- WotB Poll: Who thinks SCC 28 has been OWNED throughout this entire thread? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:42:05
- YES (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:48:34
- Yes (although, as said above, I'm not sure what it means) (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 8, 19:45:36
- maybe it means trolled... (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:46:03
- Well if that's the case, I'm permanently "owned":-( (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 8, 19:48:28
- maybe it means trolled... (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:46:03
- cos most hate bentley (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:44:54
- Got what wrong? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:47:20
- his ability (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:48:45
- You want us to bid ?15m for Bentley? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:06:12
- we don't have that sort of cash (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:11:14
- Stop going on about it then (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:15:15
- we don't have that sort of cash (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:11:14
- You want us to bid ?15m for Bentley? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:06:12
- his ability (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:48:45
- Got what wrong? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:47:20
- A shambles would be too kind (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:44:45
- WotB Poll: Who thinks SCC 28 has been OWNED throughout this entire thread? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:42:05
- but it was done with sarcasm to make the point (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:40:25
- OWNED!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:38:48
- haha (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:36:36
- How is it trolling? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:32:27
- let's hope he gets better soon (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:21:16
- Like when we played Ashton with a head fracture? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:22:01
- that's an injury not an illness (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:23:42
- Yeah, which is why he was subbed off after half an hour in the next game (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:26:50
- was that before he started feigning injuries (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:28:41
- The injury which delayed him playing for West Ham for 3 weeks after he signed? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:30:59
- do you like dean ashton? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:33:22
- Make your mind up, do you think he was really injured or not (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:35:33
- injured at plymouth? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:37:30
- Even though there was medical proof to back up he was injured? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:41:53
- at plymouth? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:42:24
- He was injured at Plymouth yes. Worthington said so (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:43:51
- what proof? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:45:09
- The scan, and the fact he didn't play for nearly a month afterwards? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:48:06
- what scan? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:49:24
- This one, the one where he was injured and missed a game (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:55:27
- the west ham scan was lies (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:58:57
- Can you back that up? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:00:45
- i know what happened (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:02:10
- No you don't, and you cannot handle the truth, or accept being wrong (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:09:34
- i know what happened (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:02:10
- Can you back that up? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 20:00:45
- the west ham scan was lies (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:58:57
- This one, the one where he was injured and missed a game (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:55:27
- what scan? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:49:24
- just admit you can't handle the turht (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:47:20
- Who *can* handle the turht? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:51:17
- rolf (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:47:30
- It's not been a good last few minutes has it? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:49:38
- The scan, and the fact he didn't play for nearly a month afterwards? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:48:06
- what proof? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:45:09
- He was injured at Plymouth yes. Worthington said so (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:43:51
- at plymouth? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:42:24
- Even though there was medical proof to back up he was injured? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:41:53
- injured at plymouth? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:37:30
- Make your mind up, do you think he was really injured or not (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:35:33
- do you like dean ashton? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:33:22
- was a great sale by us that (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:30:58
- Agree totally (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 8, 19:43:31
- So you admit you were wrong and he was injured then? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:33:12
- he was always 'injured' (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:36:05
- What are you suggesting by 'injured' please? Do you not like the truth? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:38:48
- why would I not admit it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:35:59
- soz, was a reply to scc above (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:37:39
- no probs (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:38:47
- you should have known that you cock (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:39:16
- no probs (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:38:47
- soz, was a reply to scc above (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:37:39
- he was always 'injured' (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:36:05
- indeed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:32:13
- Not really O'Neill - we only got ?750,000 for him in the end, didn't we? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:33:21
- agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:36:10
- but his career was soon over (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:35:35
- "soon"? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:39:56
- playing for them meant it was over yes (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:42:01
- owned (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:44:59
- Comprehensively so. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:57:15
- owned (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:44:59
- playing for them meant it was over yes (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:42:01
- "soon"? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:39:56
- Not really O'Neill - we only got ?750,000 for him in the end, didn't we? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:33:21
- The injury which delayed him playing for West Ham for 3 weeks after he signed? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:30:59
- was that before he started feigning injuries (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:28:41
- Yeah, which is why he was subbed off after half an hour in the next game (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:26:50
- that's an injury not an illness (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:23:42
- Like when we played Ashton with a head fracture? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:22:01
- 9th most expsensive signing in world football in 2008 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:19:29
- Looks like Harry Redknapp doesn't really want him either ... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:20:02
- a substitution hardly indicates that (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:21:38
- why is it devastating? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:24:08
- "He didn't feel well," said Redknapp. Then came the devastating caveat: "Apparently". (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:22:36
- Quite damning really, most managers would keep that in house (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:24:33
- the word apparently should be in house? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:25:54
- Does Bentley come to any of our games? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:27:42
- Or donate money to flems runs? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:28:32
- what's that got to do with anything? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:31:52
- He likes the club (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:33:47
- Bentley? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:40:09
- No Ashton (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:44:06
- oh right, looking at the series of posts (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:45:55
- I don't know who he is (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:48:32
- oh right, looking at the series of posts (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:45:55
- No Ashton (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:44:06
- Bentley? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:40:09
- He likes the club (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:33:47
- what's that got to do with anything? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:31:52
- Or donate money to flems runs? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:28:32
- The Word should have been kept in-house at Channel 4 - surely you agree? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:27:22
- Does Bentley come to any of our games? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:27:42
- the word apparently should be in house? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:25:54
- why is it devastating? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:24:18
- it means he doesn't believe him (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:26:38
- that's one way to interpret it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:29:40
- That's how i read it (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 8, 19:51:26
- Presumably that's why he's slapped in a bid for Stewart Downing? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:55:59
- competition for places is also a good way of giving a player a kick up the backside (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 8, 20:03:36
- ^^^ Are the same person. vvv (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 20:04:44
- OWNED!!!!!!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:05:25
- Yes you were. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 20:08:36
- unfortunately I can too (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 20:13:25
- Yes you were. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 20:08:36
- OWNED!!!!!!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:05:25
- ^^^ Are the same person. vvv (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 20:04:44
- competition is healthy (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 20:00:08
- competition for places is also a good way of giving a player a kick up the backside (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 8, 20:03:36
- spot on (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:52:58
- Presumably that's why he's slapped in a bid for Stewart Downing? (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:55:59
- What a load of bollocks (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:32:05
- Benters seems the kind of guy that needs (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:31:29
- I think he probably just needs his ego massaged. (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 8, 19:33:44
- It's certainly not uncommon for David Boo-entley. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:35:03
- I think he probably just needs his ego massaged. (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 8, 19:33:44
- That's how i read it (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jan 8, 19:51:26
- that's one way to interpret it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:29:40
- It suggests he thinks Bentley is lying to him. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:25:32
- it means he doesn't believe him (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:26:38
- Quite damning really, most managers would keep that in house (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:24:33
- a substitution hardly indicates that (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:21:38
- Looks like Harry Redknapp doesn't really want him either ... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 8, 19:20:02
- put in a bid glenn (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 8, 19:16:10
- hahahahaha (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 19:06:46
- just realised i've been trolled by otto!!!!!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 19:30:24
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.