of course, he didn't start today
with a midfielder playing up front instead of him.
Not really getting much of a chance, is it?
Posted By: Tricky Hawes on January 3rd 2009 at 20:09:08
Message Thread
- Is this dishonest or just plain stupid? (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Jan 3, 19:34:21
- Without him being here to clarify to answer your question, how will you ever know? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 19:53:30
- so why then did he sign him? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 19:54:29
- And he must have known that Hoolahan was 5ft 5in and about 9st 10lb (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 19:55:57
- But he's not a striker (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:01:03
- How is that relevant? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:03:43
- because wingers are usually light and nippy (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:12:38
- Hoolahan isn't playing on the wing though (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:15:41
- strikers do need to be stronger, it's true (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 3, 20:14:21
- Well, I think Russell's sterling efforts up front have done (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:16:20
- not a case of convincing (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:22:23
- Well, I think Russell's sterling efforts up front have done (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:16:20
- because wingers are usually light and nippy (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:12:38
- How is that relevant? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:03:43
- But he's not a striker (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:01:03
- Cos Wenger gave him some advice to? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 19:55:49
- of course, he didn't start today (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 3, 20:09:08
- because he wants a physical presence up front? and you get that with Russell? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:13:32
- Russell is NOT a physical player up front (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 20:30:40
- That would make more sense if it wasn't that Sibierski was playing (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 3, 20:16:43
- because he wants a physical presence up front? and you get that with Russell? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:13:32
- It's fine to take advice (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 19:58:16
- 5 from 15 apps (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:01:46
- Vast majority of those 15 as sub (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:04:12
- Why do you think he played wide for Derby? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:10:25
- Read it quite a lot - can't remember where exactly (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:13:28
- Why do you think he played wide for Derby? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:10:25
- Vast majority of those 15 as sub (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:04:12
- came on today (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 19:59:49
- good point. (NCFC) - shoddy, Jan 3, 20:09:51
- 5 from 15 apps (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:01:46
- might he? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 19:57:37
- of course, he didn't start today (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 3, 20:09:08
- And he must have known that Hoolahan was 5ft 5in and about 9st 10lb (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 19:55:57
- so why then did he sign him? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 19:54:29
- Plain stupid I think (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 19:42:08
- You can't blame a player for his 'physique' (NCFC) - King, Jan 3, 19:39:45
- Had we signed Iversen (Or whoever the "big man" was) (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jan 3, 19:38:50
- excuses (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 19:37:24
- Or an answer to why he hasn't featured (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 19:57:26
- Without him being here to clarify to answer your question, how will you ever know? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 19:53:30
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.