might he?
I wonder why then he chose not to bring him on vs Watford or against Reading or in any game in fact since he scored at Carrow Road? Doubt it's purely because Lita was here.
Posted By: Charles21 on January 3rd 2009 at 19:57:37
Message Thread
- Is this dishonest or just plain stupid? (NCFC) - Reg Presley, Jan 3, 19:34:21
- Without him being here to clarify to answer your question, how will you ever know? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 19:53:30
- so why then did he sign him? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 19:54:29
- And he must have known that Hoolahan was 5ft 5in and about 9st 10lb (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 19:55:57
- But he's not a striker (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:01:03
- How is that relevant? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:03:43
- because wingers are usually light and nippy (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:12:38
- Hoolahan isn't playing on the wing though (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:15:41
- strikers do need to be stronger, it's true (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 3, 20:14:21
- Well, I think Russell's sterling efforts up front have done (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:16:20
- not a case of convincing (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:22:23
- Well, I think Russell's sterling efforts up front have done (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:16:20
- because wingers are usually light and nippy (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:12:38
- How is that relevant? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:03:43
- But he's not a striker (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:01:03
- Cos Wenger gave him some advice to? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 19:55:49
- of course, he didn't start today (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 3, 20:09:08
- because he wants a physical presence up front? and you get that with Russell? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:13:32
- Russell is NOT a physical player up front (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 20:30:40
- That would make more sense if it wasn't that Sibierski was playing (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 3, 20:16:43
- because he wants a physical presence up front? and you get that with Russell? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:13:32
- It's fine to take advice (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 19:58:16
- 5 from 15 apps (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:01:46
- Vast majority of those 15 as sub (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:04:12
- Why do you think he played wide for Derby? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:10:25
- Read it quite a lot - can't remember where exactly (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:13:28
- Why do you think he played wide for Derby? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:10:25
- Vast majority of those 15 as sub (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 20:04:12
- came on today (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 19:59:49
- good point. (NCFC) - shoddy, Jan 3, 20:09:51
- 5 from 15 apps (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 20:01:46
- might he? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 19:57:37
- of course, he didn't start today (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 3, 20:09:08
- And he must have known that Hoolahan was 5ft 5in and about 9st 10lb (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 19:55:57
- so why then did he sign him? (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 19:54:29
- Plain stupid I think (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 3, 19:42:08
- You can't blame a player for his 'physique' (NCFC) - King, Jan 3, 19:39:45
- Had we signed Iversen (Or whoever the "big man" was) (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jan 3, 19:38:50
- excuses (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 3, 19:37:24
- Or an answer to why he hasn't featured (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 19:57:26
- Without him being here to clarify to answer your question, how will you ever know? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 3, 19:53:30
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.