the inference in that article

seemed to me to be a slight at our board "look, the scummy thieving ipswich arses can manage to pull off a stunt like this but we are incapable despite Delia stating that we are prepared top whore ourselves out" when the truth of it is somewhat different.

sensationalist claptrap, who gives a f**k what ipswich get up to? f**k 'em.

Posted By: Tomblander on November 1st 2007 at 08:10:32

Message Thread

Archant in misleading headline shocker... (Other Football) - Arganth, Nov 1, 07:45:54
- It throws the whole "do we want to sell our soul" thing more into focus than ever (Other Football) - thebigfeller, Nov 1, 08:03:50
  - I happen to agree with Delia. Read this article and make your own mind up.. (Other Football) - The Editor of Milk, Nov 1, 08:30:05
  - the inference in that article (Other Football) - Tomblander, Nov 1, 08:10:32
    - If we have a sugar daddy he must be British & local. Foreign investment is (Other Football) - CarrowRoeder, Nov 1, 08:31:10
      - you need to be uberrich or gaga to invest in football directly (Other Football) - Tomblander, Nov 1, 08:35:26
        
        What happens if we go down? Will they still be the right board for us even then? (n/m) (Other Football) - thebigfeller, Nov 1, 08:40:27
        
        dint say they were the right board did I? (Other Football) - Tomblander, Nov 1, 08:45:51
        
        One thing I would conclude (Other Football) - thebigfeller, Nov 1, 08:57:05
    - The inference for me was slightly different. (Other Football) - Arganth, Nov 1, 08:21:21
      - appreciate that viewpoint (Other Football) - Tomblander, Nov 1, 08:25:18
        
        Totally agree. (n/m) (Other Football) - Arganth, Nov 1, 08:29:48

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.