I think the FA essentially say what Saucerer suggests; i.e. no actual evidence of that

The video evidence showed no greater level of rough treatment than would ordinarily be expected. Doubt it would have made much difference anyway.

You’re right, of course, that kind of thing shouldn’t be allowed. But it’s no excuse either.

Posted By: SimonOTBC on January 22nd 2025 at 13:16:01

Message Thread

Prob WW2, but the FA Written Reasons re Sainz have been published (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 22, 11:38:35
- You say futile mitigation.... (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jan 22, 12:28:00
  - I think the FA essentially say what Saucerer suggests; i.e. no actual evidence of that (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 22, 13:16:01
  - Agreed, but what evidence do we have of that? (NCFC) - Saucerer, Jan 22, 13:04:12
    - I saw Chris Mepham give him a chinese burn and Luke O'Nien stole his lunch money (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Jan 22, 13:21:57
- Weird how Kenny’s have never been published (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 22, 11:46:47
  - It reads..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 22, 12:40:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.