Agreed, but what evidence do we have of that?

Only Sainz's claims. Tbf, I do believe that is no doubt true, but I also believe every team has a player or two in their side who specialises in some level of intimidation. We probably do.

Part of the game I expect. No justification whatsoever for spitting.

Posted By: Saucerer on January 22nd 2025 at 13:04:12

Message Thread

Prob WW2, but the FA Written Reasons re Sainz have been published (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 22, 11:38:35
- You say futile mitigation.... (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Jan 22, 12:28:00
  - I think the FA essentially say what Saucerer suggests; i.e. no actual evidence of that (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 22, 13:16:01
  - Agreed, but what evidence do we have of that? (NCFC) - Saucerer, Jan 22, 13:04:12
    - I saw Chris Mepham give him a chinese burn and Luke O'Nien stole his lunch money (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Jan 22, 13:21:57
- Weird how Kenny’s have never been published (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 22, 11:46:47
  - It reads..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 22, 12:40:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.