I don’t think you’ve read my post correctly

It’s not that he won Islington North. It’s that he won more votes for labour than Starmer did, along with a higher percentage share of the vote.

2019 = brexit election
2017= very close election between Boris mania and corbynistas

Labour have actually lost vote share in England last night compared to Corbyn. They won because people stopped voting conservatives, not because more voted labour.

Therefore, your point is nullified.

Posted By: SenatusAcademicus on July 5th 2024 at 16:27:27

Message Thread

So Corbyn is acquitted then? (NCFC) - SenatusAcademicus, Jul 5, 12:33:57
- Put simply - a lot of people didn't like him. I was a big supporter but (NCFC) - Pixelman, Jul 5, 14:21:45
  - Indeed. The moment that he tried to deny that Russia was behind the Skripal poisoning (NCFC) - Bertie Russell, Jul 5, 14:29:04
    - I don’t think you’ve read my post correctly (NCFC) - SenatusAcademicus, Jul 5, 16:27:27
      - Corbyn lost. Under him the Labour party got destroyed. (NCFC) - Bertie Russell, Jul 5, 16:52:05
        
        What absolute nonsense. Did you not read the post? Labour got FEWER votes than in 2019 (NCFC) - Cable Gap Pioneer, Jul 5, 17:05:09
        
        He clearly doesn’t read… one more try… (NCFC) - SenatusAcademicus, Jul 5, 17:52:29
        
        "Yes I do think Corbyn did better than starmer." (NCFC) - Bertie Russell, Jul 5, 18:10:52
        
        Think for yourself for once. (n/m) (NCFC) - SenatusAcademicus, Jul 5, 18:38:19
        
        Do you honestly, seriously think that Labour did better in 2019 than this time? (n/m) (NCFC) - Bertie Russell, Jul 5, 17:09:26
        
        (and just because you clearly are very 'hard of thinking' (NCFC) - Bertie Russell, Jul 5, 17:11:37
        
        (To add though - your post does, once again, demonstrate (NCFC) - Bertie Russell, Jul 5, 16:55:35
    - would that have been the moment (NCFC) - paulg, Jul 5, 14:34:46
      - Nope (NCFC) - Bertie Russell, Jul 5, 14:53:05
        
        You’re far too sensible to be Essex 👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jul 5, 15:16:18
        
        Essex has gone - that's my take (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Jul 5, 15:17:09
- He was a threat and what better way to suppress that by smear campaigning (n/m) (NCFC) - Lentil Weaver, Jul 5, 12:42:20

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.