I don’t agree with ever giving an option to buy with a loan unless it’s a good fee
Posted By: Jim on May 30th 2024 at 14:32:58
Message Thread
- Fortuna confirm Tzolis and they will flip him for more money later in summer (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, May 30, 12:08:17
- It's OK, with the money we can buy another Fassnacht (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, May 30, 12:28:15
- Well done Stuart Webber you f**king imbecile (NCFC) - Jim, May 30, 12:09:17
- Apparently we have a 50% sell on clause (NCFC) - Kev, May 30, 14:49:56
- 😂 (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, May 30, 14:06:20
- what a fucking stupid statement (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, May 30, 12:38:15
- We know what we paid, we know what we're selling him for (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:41:36
- There might be a sell on clause. (n/m) (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, May 30, 13:48:22
- Possibly - but we also know that we set a sale price trigger which is way below his value (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:56:49
- Maybe he was only worth that at the time. If he couldn't even get in a Champs team (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, May 30, 13:59:20
- But if a player is out on loan, why set a fixed fee? (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 14:19:30
- Maybe it was the dealbreaker. Seems like an sign on agreed fee is often part of loan deals (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, May 30, 14:32:39
- But if a player is out on loan, why set a fixed fee? (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 14:19:30
- Maybe he was only worth that at the time. If he couldn't even get in a Champs team (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, May 30, 13:59:20
- Possibly - but we also know that we set a sale price trigger which is way below his value (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:56:49
- There might be a sell on clause. (n/m) (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, May 30, 13:48:22
- I know we have them an option to purchase him at a price well (NCFC) - Jim, May 30, 12:52:00
- Managers don't have a tendency of giving away their best players (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, May 30, 13:11:31
- But (as above) we set a low sale price (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:57:27
- tbf no one called it as low when set. Most were glad to see the back of him... (NCFC) - Pixelman, May 30, 14:05:24
- the values weren't know were they? (NCFC) - CWC, May 30, 16:51:59
- I don’t agree with ever giving an option to buy with a loan unless it’s a good fee (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, May 30, 14:32:58
- He was very highly thought of and it didn't work well it here (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 14:24:43
- tbf no one called it as low when set. Most were glad to see the back of him... (NCFC) - Pixelman, May 30, 14:05:24
- But (as above) we set a low sale price (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:57:27
- Managers don't have a tendency of giving away their best players (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, May 30, 13:11:31
- We know what we paid, we know what we're selling him for (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:41:36
- We’ve been absolutely stitched up. Webber you knob. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, May 30, 12:31:04
- why couldn't the touchpaper be lit on him as an NCFC player? (NCFC) - MonkeyPuzzle, May 30, 12:22:42
- Yea really shit deal although for balance … (NCFC) - loz, May 30, 12:16:05
- VVMT (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 12:11:15
- We should buy him (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, May 30, 12:10:26
- Agreed. Then put him on loan for with a low option to buy fee and repeat (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Breadstick, May 30, 14:26:55
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.