tbf no one called it as low when set. Most were glad to see the back of him...
hindsight is wonderful as you get two chances to be right.
Posted By: Pixelman on May 30th 2024 at 14:05:24
Message Thread
- Fortuna confirm Tzolis and they will flip him for more money later in summer (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, May 30, 12:08:17
- It's OK, with the money we can buy another Fassnacht (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, May 30, 12:28:15
- Well done Stuart Webber you f**king imbecile (NCFC) - Jim, May 30, 12:09:17
- Apparently we have a 50% sell on clause (NCFC) - Kev, May 30, 14:49:56
- 😂 (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, May 30, 14:06:20
- what a fucking stupid statement (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, May 30, 12:38:15
- We know what we paid, we know what we're selling him for (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:41:36
- There might be a sell on clause. (n/m) (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, May 30, 13:48:22
- Possibly - but we also know that we set a sale price trigger which is way below his value (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:56:49
- Maybe he was only worth that at the time. If he couldn't even get in a Champs team (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, May 30, 13:59:20
- But if a player is out on loan, why set a fixed fee? (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 14:19:30
- Maybe it was the dealbreaker. Seems like an sign on agreed fee is often part of loan deals (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, May 30, 14:32:39
- But if a player is out on loan, why set a fixed fee? (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 14:19:30
- Maybe he was only worth that at the time. If he couldn't even get in a Champs team (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, May 30, 13:59:20
- Possibly - but we also know that we set a sale price trigger which is way below his value (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:56:49
- There might be a sell on clause. (n/m) (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, May 30, 13:48:22
- I know we have them an option to purchase him at a price well (NCFC) - Jim, May 30, 12:52:00
- Managers don't have a tendency of giving away their best players (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, May 30, 13:11:31
- But (as above) we set a low sale price (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:57:27
- tbf no one called it as low when set. Most were glad to see the back of him... (NCFC) - Pixelman, May 30, 14:05:24
- the values weren't know were they? (NCFC) - CWC, May 30, 16:51:59
- I don’t agree with ever giving an option to buy with a loan unless it’s a good fee (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, May 30, 14:32:58
- He was very highly thought of and it didn't work well it here (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 14:24:43
- tbf no one called it as low when set. Most were glad to see the back of him... (NCFC) - Pixelman, May 30, 14:05:24
- But (as above) we set a low sale price (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:57:27
- Managers don't have a tendency of giving away their best players (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, May 30, 13:11:31
- We know what we paid, we know what we're selling him for (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 13:41:36
- We’ve been absolutely stitched up. Webber you knob. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, May 30, 12:31:04
- why couldn't the touchpaper be lit on him as an NCFC player? (NCFC) - MonkeyPuzzle, May 30, 12:22:42
- Yea really shit deal although for balance … (NCFC) - loz, May 30, 12:16:05
- VVMT (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, May 30, 12:11:15
- We should buy him (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, May 30, 12:10:26
- Agreed. Then put him on loan for with a low option to buy fee and repeat (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Breadstick, May 30, 14:26:55
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.