That Wolves goal

For what it’s worth I don’t think that should be disallowed as the keeper was not saving it and wolves later did not impact on his ability to try snd save it.

BUT. It was just like the Cantwell one and at the time I recall all the pundits were of the view it was technically offside.

Posted By: Jim on April 7th 2024 at 07:29:38

Message Thread

That Wolves goal (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 7, 07:29:38
- Such a weird take by all the pundits (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Apr 7, 08:30:24
- I barely ever watch VAR replays now. I just look away and wait for the decision (NCFC) - Lentil Weaver, Apr 7, 07:56:34
- Irrelevant that he wouldn’t have saved it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 7, 07:42:38
  - It is one of the clearest offsides I have ever seen (NCFC) - earlydoors, Apr 7, 08:10:53
    - It’s baffling that there has been any controversy around it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 7, 08:20:54
  - It’s not as the rule states that the interfere cr (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 7, 07:47:38
    - Sorry it’s not irrelevant as…. (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 7, 07:49:18
      - Which he does! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 7, 08:05:07
        
        The relevant bit of the law is ignored (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 7, 08:10:53
        
        No you are misinterpreting it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 7, 08:17:02
        
        They have been given guidance as to how they should interpret it (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 7, 08:39:45
        
        It applies to more than just vision (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 7, 09:23:47

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.