It definitely wasn’t, but it would be great if it was
It would be even more obviously overturned.
However, if you watch the incident, the ref isn’t interested until the alleged kick out, so definitely that and not the tackle.
Posted By: SimonOTBC on March 8th 2024 at 09:25:34
Message Thread
- the Sainz tackle (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 8, 09:08:32
- Mr Madley has difficulty seeing which player commits a foul when NCFC are involved (NCFC) - trt354, Mar 8, 09:41:01
- Because he didn’t give howson’s tackle as a foul (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 10:41:50
- No, that's rubbish. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Mar 8, 09:25:43
- It definitely wasn’t, but it would be great if it was (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 09:25:34
- Perhaps, but Howson looked to be going in two-footed... (n/m) (NCFC) - Wilts, Mar 8, 09:11:32
- that maybe but ... (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 8, 09:14:52
- Well if he did then it will get reversed. Pretty sure it was (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 8, 09:25:38
- That's true... (NCFC) - Wilts, Mar 8, 09:23:42
- that maybe but ... (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 8, 09:14:52
- Mr Madley has difficulty seeing which player commits a foul when NCFC are involved (NCFC) - trt354, Mar 8, 09:41:01
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.