Basically confirming that most players are cheats
Posted By: jamesward on March 8th 2024 at 08:47:15
Message Thread
- I think Sainz wins his appeal today (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 08:11:59
- Let me know if I have to do anything (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, Mar 8, 12:24:29
- You can read previous decisions on the FAs website (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 11:58:36
- Quite analogeous albeit it was contact during a challenge not an alleged kick out (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 8, 12:31:32
- It’s previous overturns like this (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 12:03:26
- I am sure he’ll win the appeal. (NCFC) - Fenwood Lad, Mar 8, 09:55:31
- Dead to me, JH (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Mar 8, 09:41:17
- Hero to zero and I hope the lego-headed c88t is reading this (n/m) (NCFC) - MonkeyPuzzle, Mar 8, 10:52:23
- Almost certainly is (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Mar 8, 11:01:28
- Same as a dive for a pen, players are always gonna look for it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Lentil Weaver, Mar 8, 09:47:34
- Perfectly fine (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:43:15
- Good to see Kenny pointing out to his face that he was cheating (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 10:25:29
- Hero to zero and I hope the lego-headed c88t is reading this (n/m) (NCFC) - MonkeyPuzzle, Mar 8, 10:52:23
- I am not sure he will. I think he should but they will want to protect their boy Madley. (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Mar 8, 09:01:45
- Admitting it was a naughty challenge from him as well. (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Mar 8, 08:58:11
- "contacts contact" (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Mar 8, 08:49:41
- I hate that line, so often trotted out by players and pundits (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 8, 09:26:33
- *' (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Mar 8, 08:50:44
- Basically confirming that most players are cheats (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 8, 08:47:15
- I sent a couple of views of it to former Prem Ref I know.. His response.... (NCFC) - Azteca, Mar 8, 11:47:36
- Yeah. What Howson did is no different to a player going down for a penno after minimal con (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 8, 08:49:31
- *contact (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 8, 08:49:44
- What is the definition of violent conduct? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 08:24:14
- Not what Sainz did! (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 8, 08:39:11
- Here: (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 08:32:51
- Any kick out is an attempt at excessive force tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 08:44:49
- I don’t think so (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 09:03:57
- No its not. But he didn't kick out anyway (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 8, 08:48:07
- yes it is ... (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 8, 09:05:50
- Nope. Any kick out is a foul. Violent conduct requires excessive force or brutality (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 8, 09:28:02
- If a player pushes another gently in the chest they are not sent off (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 8, 09:30:43
- Interesting ref talk here (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:39:16
- Interesting how few refs know the rules based on that (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 09:51:51
- Many laws are fairly ambiguous (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:58:31
- Yes, and also I think it’s based on common practice more than the letter of the law (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 10:19:52
- Many laws are fairly ambiguous (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:58:31
- Interesting how few refs know the rules based on that (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 09:51:51
- Yes, and excessive force is defined too: (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 09:38:17
- As it was totally unnecessary (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:42:56
- He wasn't in danger of injuring Howson (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 8, 09:54:34
- Doesn’t take much with studs tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 10:08:48
- I suppose if you're counting a slight graze or reddening of the skin (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 8, 10:14:55
- I think the main problem is that the presumption of the panel is that the ref was correct (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 10:24:36
- I suppose if you're counting a slight graze or reddening of the skin (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 8, 10:14:55
- Doesn’t take much with studs tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 10:08:48
- If that counts as being in danger of injuring Howson, so does every single tackle (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 09:48:50
- Tackles are a necessary part of the game though (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:52:15
- Yes there is, but the language used is the same (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 10:21:28
- Tackles are a necessary part of the game though (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:52:15
- He wasn't in danger of injuring Howson (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 8, 09:54:34
- As it was totally unnecessary (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:42:56
- Can’t injure someone by pushing them (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:33:43
- Interesting ref talk here (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:39:16
- If a player pushes another gently in the chest they are not sent off (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 8, 09:30:43
- Yep (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 09:22:42
- Nope. Any kick out is a foul. Violent conduct requires excessive force or brutality (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 8, 09:28:02
- Could certainly be interpreted that way. Anything more than no force is excessive!! (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Mar 8, 08:57:15
- yes it is ... (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 8, 09:05:50
- I think he should win the appeal. Different rules vs if it was howson’s face (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 08:33:25
- Any kick out is an attempt at excessive force tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 08:44:49
- All depends on interpretation I think (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 08:25:47
- BEEP BEEP BEEP (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 8, 08:13:28
- .... (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 8, 08:38:31
- ... (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Mar 8, 08:25:50
- However the appeal goes (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 8, 08:24:00
- 😂😂😂 (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 8, 08:23:30
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.