Players pretty much never make formal transfer requests any more
Which enables them to leave while still claiming 'loyalty' bonuses!
Posted By: mr carra on October 1st 2020 at 14:46:26
Message Thread
- Todd Cantwell (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 13:55:47
- Lots of Leeds chat the it's £15m to £18m range by the way (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 15:26:25
- Swap for Bamford will do (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 1, 16:03:14
- Hasn’t Phil Hay their main journalist played it down ? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 1, 15:57:41
- Indeed. Phil Hay is their Michael Bailey for those that dont know (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 16:38:50
- I don't really understand the point you're making (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 1, 14:32:05
- point 1 (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 14:46:24
- We had him over a barrel didn’t we? (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 1, 18:30:00
- What Ant? Joined the SAS (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 1, 15:26:58
- Point 2 he started 18 games and scored 1 goal (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 15:11:45
- Why doesnt he just submit a formal transfer request? (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 14:33:06
- Why should he? (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 1, 14:38:59
- The only grief I have is that he's not focused in training (NCFC) - Azteca, Oct 1, 16:54:48
- I agree - I don't get it either (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 1, 15:19:07
- Absolutely agree. He is lucky fans aren't going to be in though (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 15:22:40
- Because that's what you do if you want to leave (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 14:40:33
- Players pretty much never make formal transfer requests any more (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 1, 14:46:26
- Indeed! Which is why the club have to hold out... Basically make the signing club pay it (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 15:12:44
- Players pretty much never make formal transfer requests any more (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 1, 14:46:26
- Why should he? (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 1, 14:38:59
- point 1 (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 14:46:24
- Could've been the club fighting for the longer deal (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 1, 14:27:10
- Exactly, somewhat naive of Henclrikus there (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 1, 14:40:50
- Every agent wants the best wages for their client. (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 14:49:48
- At the time, he wasn't a first team regular (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 1, 15:26:38
- Idah had never even been on the bench (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 15:50:37
- Because he was cheap, durr (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 1, 16:10:28
- of course. His agent just rolled over! (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 16:18:47
- Exactly on lower wages (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 1, 16:13:56
- On a lower salary, presumably.... (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 1, 16:05:00
- Come round (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 1, 16:10:42
- Will be there in 5 (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 1, 16:19:41
- they say that but my six wives disagree ... (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 16:09:05
- Come round (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 1, 16:10:42
- Because he was cheap, durr (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 1, 16:10:28
- Idah had never even been on the bench (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 15:50:37
- I think there was a Webber interview that discussed it at the time and we wanted longer (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 15:13:51
- link me up then. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 15:21:54
- Here's the pinkun article at the time... (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 15:36:37
- that does not state that a longer contract was rejected (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 15:47:35
- Why would he be offered the same terms ... (NCFC) - loz, Oct 1, 16:11:03
- No it doesn't. And terms are always individual. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 15:54:03
- part of the anti-Todd band-wagon (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 15:58:08
- Well Webber clearly hints at the agent/someone being difficult in that negotiation ... (NCFC) - loz, Oct 1, 16:15:00
- Where is the anti-Todd bandwagon? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 1, 16:09:42
- Even his employers are throwing him under the bus (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 16:26:00
- Hardly, if he’s not training properly that’s on him (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 1, 17:13:53
- comparing his attacking value against Grant Hanley? (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 17:46:54
- Hardly, if he’s not training properly that’s on him (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 1, 17:13:53
- Even his employers are throwing him under the bus (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 16:26:00
- part of the anti-Todd band-wagon (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 15:58:08
- that does not state that a longer contract was rejected (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 15:47:35
- Here's the pinkun article at the time... (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 15:36:37
- link me up then. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 15:21:54
- At the time, he wasn't a first team regular (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 1, 15:26:38
- Every agent wants the best wages for their client. (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 14:49:48
- I think that was the case. Pretty sure we have an option on an extra year... (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 14:35:04
- Vimto (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 1, 14:29:30
- Exactly, somewhat naive of Henclrikus there (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 1, 14:40:50
- England Call up? (n/m) (NCFC) - KevinBond, Oct 1, 13:58:21
- And, btw (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 13:58:12
- Why wouldn’t he be? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 1, 14:01:56
- being dropped for poor training is a big, red flag. (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 1, 14:18:33
- Messing about in training? Jamal didn't play for N.Ireland when signing for the Geordies (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 1, 14:04:22
- Jamal asked permission to skip the game to sign I believe (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 14:27:46
- Why wouldn’t he be? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 1, 14:01:56
- Lots of Leeds chat the it's £15m to £18m range by the way (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Oct 1, 15:26:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.