It says nothing to show that the NHS is for sale, in fact if anything it

suggests the opposite in that there are statements in there that make it clear the UK is preparing to defend its position on issues relating to pharmaceuticals and medicines.

At worst you could argue that it shows that the US is "fishing" in this area to see what our response might be.

I would think that the fact he is prepared to put these confidential documents into the public domain and basically lie about what they say in a general election campaign actually reflects very badly on Corbyn and ought to be the final nail in his coffin.

Posted By: Jim on November 27th 2019 at 13:57:52

Message Thread

So. That NHS document sounds interesting eh? (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 27, 11:26:05
- It says nothing to show that the NHS is for sale, in fact if anything it (General Chat) - Jim, Nov 27, 13:57:52
  - that's as may be (General Chat) - CWC, Nov 27, 14:29:24
  - It’s all from before Boris took over anyway and when he took over he stated under him NHS (General Chat) - Boris, Nov 27, 14:17:41
    - Bound to be true then. (n/m) (General Chat) - APB, Nov 27, 15:51:47
  - Johnson could throw up all over Mishal Hussain and you'd somehow spin it (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 14:16:30
    - I’m not spinning it. I’ve read the documents and they (General Chat) - Jim, Nov 27, 14:25:25
      - your last paragraph in your 1st post is pure bullshit spin, Jim. (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 15:01:09
        
        Why is it spin? (General Chat) - Jim, Nov 27, 16:09:31
        
        I don't think corbyn would be that stupid (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 15:10:10
        
        has Johnson apologised for his own remarks? (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 15:27:45
        
        More to the point (General Chat) - duke of york, Nov 27, 15:39:28
        
        You debate with people you disagree with not those that you agree with (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 15:56:27
        
        tru' dat (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 15:42:26
        
        Has corbyn apologised for being a terroist sympathiser? (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 15:37:23
        
        yeah, even Ian Paisley and the protestants thanked him for his role in the lasting peace (General Chat) - Boringstoke_Canary, Nov 27, 15:47:01
        
        Has Johnson apologised for bringing the DUP into power? (General Chat) - CWC, Nov 27, 15:45:08
        
        I'm not outraged with corbyn by any stretch, i truly believe (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 16:02:29
        
        Well you are just enforcing the point now (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 15:55:00
- i suppose BJ will say (General Chat) - paulg, Nov 27, 12:21:39
  - Yes I’ve just had a quick butchers at the docs and indeed it is more an argument against (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 27, 12:40:55
    - question for Steve .... do you have a vote in the general election (General Chat) - ghostof barry butler, Nov 27, 13:48:36
      - Generalisation. I do not have a vote as the tories also ignores their promise of vote for (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 27, 18:43:32
  - I do wonder exactly what it would take... (General Chat) - Dog, Nov 27, 12:27:10
    - Helping the poor? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 27, 12:32:53
- It does, what is more interesting though is how jeremy got hold of unredacted version (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 12:00:04
  - Is that really more interesting? Really?! (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 27, 12:00:46
    - Of course. Especially if they haven't been verified at the moment (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 12:10:21
      - What a great way to move attention away from anti semitism row and not apologising though (n/m) (General Chat) - eddie, Nov 27, 12:12:51
        
        ^^^ a great attempt to move attention away from the seeling off of the NHS to the Merkins (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 12:19:44
        
        Same document he had in his hand for the debate and he waits till today (General Chat) - eddie, Nov 27, 12:23:20
        
        he was holding the redacted documents (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 12:29:56
        
        Let’s hope so (n/m) (General Chat) - Dog, Nov 27, 12:33:51
        
        No, the document he had was redacted (General Chat) - Tressells Broadbrush, Nov 27, 12:29:20
        
        Either way people who have seen it have said it contains no smoking guns (General Chat) - eddie, Nov 27, 12:30:48
        
        Ok eddie (n/m) (General Chat) - Dog, Nov 27, 12:33:16
        
        It’s not the same document (n/m) (General Chat) - Dog, Nov 27, 12:25:31
        
        True, I reckon this will last a day and it will be back to it (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 12:14:10
      - Suppose it just outlines the US's intentions and red lines (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 12:11:22
        
        Good our government has a proven track record of holding out against red lines (General Chat) - CWC, Nov 27, 13:18:48
- Very (n/m) (General Chat) - loz, Nov 27, 11:38:50
  - Scanned them now. Horrible feeling this will backfire on Corbyn. (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 27, 13:26:18

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.