Yes I’ve just had a quick butchers at the docs and indeed it is more an argument against

Brexit in my opinion. Not specifically a boris thing but then we’re meant to be voting specifically for a party’s policies, not the leader anyway.

Nothing at all really surprising though. But does show how the “so called experts” may actually have been right after all. Stunning really.

Posted By: Steve in Holland on November 27th 2019 at 12:40:55

Message Thread

So. That NHS document sounds interesting eh? (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 27, 11:26:05
- It says nothing to show that the NHS is for sale, in fact if anything it (General Chat) - Jim, Nov 27, 13:57:52
  - that's as may be (General Chat) - CWC, Nov 27, 14:29:24
  - It’s all from before Boris took over anyway and when he took over he stated under him NHS (General Chat) - Boris, Nov 27, 14:17:41
    - Bound to be true then. (n/m) (General Chat) - APB, Nov 27, 15:51:47
  - Johnson could throw up all over Mishal Hussain and you'd somehow spin it (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 14:16:30
    - I’m not spinning it. I’ve read the documents and they (General Chat) - Jim, Nov 27, 14:25:25
      - your last paragraph in your 1st post is pure bullshit spin, Jim. (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 15:01:09
        
        Why is it spin? (General Chat) - Jim, Nov 27, 16:09:31
        
        I don't think corbyn would be that stupid (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 15:10:10
        
        has Johnson apologised for his own remarks? (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 15:27:45
        
        More to the point (General Chat) - duke of york, Nov 27, 15:39:28
        
        You debate with people you disagree with not those that you agree with (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 15:56:27
        
        tru' dat (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 15:42:26
        
        Has corbyn apologised for being a terroist sympathiser? (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 15:37:23
        
        yeah, even Ian Paisley and the protestants thanked him for his role in the lasting peace (General Chat) - Boringstoke_Canary, Nov 27, 15:47:01
        
        Has Johnson apologised for bringing the DUP into power? (General Chat) - CWC, Nov 27, 15:45:08
        
        I'm not outraged with corbyn by any stretch, i truly believe (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 16:02:29
        
        Well you are just enforcing the point now (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 15:55:00
- i suppose BJ will say (General Chat) - paulg, Nov 27, 12:21:39
  - Yes I’ve just had a quick butchers at the docs and indeed it is more an argument against (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 27, 12:40:55
    - question for Steve .... do you have a vote in the general election (General Chat) - ghostof barry butler, Nov 27, 13:48:36
      - Generalisation. I do not have a vote as the tories also ignores their promise of vote for (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 27, 18:43:32
  - I do wonder exactly what it would take... (General Chat) - Dog, Nov 27, 12:27:10
    - Helping the poor? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Nov 27, 12:32:53
- It does, what is more interesting though is how jeremy got hold of unredacted version (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 12:00:04
  - Is that really more interesting? Really?! (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 27, 12:00:46
    - Of course. Especially if they haven't been verified at the moment (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 12:10:21
      - What a great way to move attention away from anti semitism row and not apologising though (n/m) (General Chat) - eddie, Nov 27, 12:12:51
        
        ^^^ a great attempt to move attention away from the seeling off of the NHS to the Merkins (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 12:19:44
        
        Same document he had in his hand for the debate and he waits till today (General Chat) - eddie, Nov 27, 12:23:20
        
        he was holding the redacted documents (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Nov 27, 12:29:56
        
        Let’s hope so (n/m) (General Chat) - Dog, Nov 27, 12:33:51
        
        No, the document he had was redacted (General Chat) - Tressells Broadbrush, Nov 27, 12:29:20
        
        Either way people who have seen it have said it contains no smoking guns (General Chat) - eddie, Nov 27, 12:30:48
        
        Ok eddie (n/m) (General Chat) - Dog, Nov 27, 12:33:16
        
        It’s not the same document (n/m) (General Chat) - Dog, Nov 27, 12:25:31
        
        True, I reckon this will last a day and it will be back to it (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 12:14:10
      - Suppose it just outlines the US's intentions and red lines (n/m) (General Chat) - KetteringRyu, Nov 27, 12:11:22
        
        Good our government has a proven track record of holding out against red lines (General Chat) - CWC, Nov 27, 13:18:48
- Very (n/m) (General Chat) - loz, Nov 27, 11:38:50
  - Scanned them now. Horrible feeling this will backfire on Corbyn. (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 27, 13:26:18

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.