Apparently Farke laid down the law in week prior to match... - Wrath of the Barclay

Apparently Farke laid down the law in week prior to match...

unhappy with some players work rates. Notably difference in Emi and Marco results.

Posted By: Pixelman on September 17th 2019 at 10:23:23

Message Thread

I'm crap at analysis, formations and all that (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 17, 09:29:29
- Apparently Farke laid down the law in week prior to match... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Sep 17, 10:23:23
- Read the comments about trybull and tettey but have to say I suspect that if anything it (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 17, 10:19:46
  - I think it *is* that simple, it’s nothing to do with Leitner. (NCFC) - APB, Sep 17, 10:39:34
    - Probably needed a bollocking too (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 17, 10:46:30
      - maybe he's better suited when argos is in the side? (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 17, 11:38:26
  - Ball, not bad (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 17, 10:20:19
- I don't think his role changed markedly but i think he played a little deeper and more (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 17, 09:44:58
  - And the main reason for that is because Trybull doesn't (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 17, 09:47:35
    - Agreed and in that respect Farke having no option but to play Tettey for a few games (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 17, 09:57:55
- Same here. I thought it was like last season when Emi was often our best defensive player (NCFC) - bird table, Sep 17, 09:41:47
  - Can anyone explain to me the logic of (a) subbing off Emi at all and (b) replacing him (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 17, 10:16:07
    - suppose he could have put mcgovern on (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 17, 10:25:22
      - This... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 17, 10:26:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.