Fucking Nora!!!
What two people choose to consensually do with their bodies, relationships and time is neither yours, the laws or anyone else’s business.
When you choose to join the 21st century, come on back but until then please do kindly f**k your Neanderthalic self right off.
Posted By: TheGrump on June 7th 2019 at 16:39:02
Message Thread
- Okay, in for a penny - in for a pound! (NCFC) - Highlander, Jun 7, 15:50:41
- Board Violation (NCFC) - Fleggster, Jun 7, 19:44:50
- Oops (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Jun 7, 18:59:54
- I would be really pissed off..... (NCFC) - promethian1, Jun 7, 18:12:33
- “soft goal” (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 18:21:33
- oh gawd... (NCFC) - promethian1, Jun 7, 18:27:14
- “soft goal” (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 18:21:33
- Gooooooood Lord. (NCFC) - Old Man, Jun 7, 17:11:51
- ☝️👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Jun 7, 18:58:18
- Very true indeed (as per article below) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jun 7, 17:26:50
- And this is exactly why there are no openly gay footballers. Because of people like you (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jun 7, 17:08:15
- And this is exactly why there are no openly gay footballers. Because of people like you (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jun 7, 17:07:57
- Fucking Nora!!! (NCFC) - TheGrump, Jun 7, 16:39:02
- There are a fair few openly gay women footballers (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 7, 16:34:10
- Is that meant as some kind of defence to your outdated bigoted views? (n/m) (NCFC) - maidstoneyellow, Jun 7, 16:33:32
- I'd do a big fist pump (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jun 7, 16:31:00
- Alright, breathe... (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jun 7, 16:29:07
- I think he would cheer and probably cum his pants (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jun 7, 17:10:41
- I wouldn't care (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 7, 16:28:09
- A strange analogy (NCFC) - Oscarnary, Jun 7, 16:19:04
- Ha ha. Anal. You wrote anal. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:25:49
- I'd be astonished and insanely proud (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jun 7, 16:18:10
- "Seemingly allows". This is not a conversation started in good faith (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jun 7, 16:22:32
- i think that might count as some sort of technical homosexualiity (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 16:25:02
- It's okay as long as your birch yourself for 12 hours afterwards (n/m) (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jun 7, 16:27:35
- Now, that really would be a good goal celebration (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 16:30:03
- It's okay as long as your birch yourself for 12 hours afterwards (n/m) (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jun 7, 16:27:35
- i think that might count as some sort of technical homosexualiity (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 16:25:02
- "Seemingly allows". This is not a conversation started in good faith (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jun 7, 16:22:32
- People are going to dunk on you for this hypothetical scenario, but (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 7, 16:13:52
- It's a staggeringly stupid analogy isn't it? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 7, 16:15:58
- Kind of, but (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 7, 16:37:57
- Could be trolling (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 16:24:38
- I think it’s an amusing anal-ogy. (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:30:33
- Generally, I think trolls play a valuable role (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 16:27:42
- It's a staggeringly stupid analogy isn't it? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 7, 16:15:58
- I'd join in (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 7, 16:08:02
- What, and enroach upon the field of play? Therein lies the real crime here! (n/m) (NCFC) - 702, Jun 7, 16:09:22
- I would be over the moon, that two NCFC players (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Jun 7, 16:04:54
- If you played for Norwich, in the mid 90s say, and Ruel Fox put in a peach of a cross that (NCFC) - 702, Jun 7, 15:57:17
- saucy wink and pursed lips I reckon (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 16:00:29
- More to the point though, how about answering some straightforward questions (NCFC) - norway, Jun 7, 15:56:32
- I need some more detail (NCFC) - norway, Jun 7, 15:55:08
- Oh no, it’s happened again. (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:09:07
- Haha (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 7, 15:58:22
- New goal music (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Jun 7, 15:57:38
- I was hoping that link was “Je t’aime, moi non plus”. (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:10:37
- I was hoping it was this (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 16:17:00
- I was hoping that link was “Je t’aime, moi non plus”. (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:10:37
- All good points (NCFC) - Highlander, Jun 7, 15:56:55
- Well, whatever they are, the same laws will apply (NCFC) - norway, Jun 7, 16:00:50
- Presumably it would have to be outraging public decency? (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 16:03:41
- I don't think people snog in public as much as they used to (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 7, 16:32:28
- “Inside” (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:11:04
- lol - indeed. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Jun 7, 16:04:57
- Presumably it would have to be outraging public decency? (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 16:03:41
- Well, whatever they are, the same laws will apply (NCFC) - norway, Jun 7, 16:00:50
- "overly close" - who decides what the right amount of closeness is? The ref? The fans? (n/m) (NCFC) - 702, Jun 7, 15:55:05
- The ref would measure and mark out the permissible zone of encroachment with his sprayy (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jun 7, 16:41:34
- VAR (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 7, 16:14:52
- The law (NCFC) - Highlander, Jun 7, 15:59:34
- I'm not sure there's a law against kissing and cuddling in public? (NCFC) - 702, Jun 7, 16:04:51
- Yes... “wife”. (n/m) (NCFC) - Wilts, Jun 7, 19:33:36
- I'm not sure there's a law against kissing and cuddling in public? (NCFC) - 702, Jun 7, 16:04:51
- Perfectly comfortable, although I’d probably class a (NCFC) - woody, Jun 7, 15:54:13
- Dismissive humour (NCFC) - Highlander, Jun 7, 16:01:58
- I really didn't find it difficult at all. I can see that you are unlikely to be able to (NCFC) - woody, Jun 7, 16:25:49
- I'd want it to be properly choreographed (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 15:59:23
- Dismissive humour (NCFC) - Highlander, Jun 7, 16:01:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.