"overly close" - who decides what the right amount of closeness is? The ref? The fans?

Posted By: 702 on June 7th 2019 at 15:55:05

Message Thread

Okay, in for a penny - in for a pound! (NCFC) - Highlander, Jun 7, 15:50:41
- Board Violation (NCFC) - Fleggster, Jun 7, 19:44:50
- Oops (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Jun 7, 18:59:54
- I would be really pissed off..... (NCFC) - promethian1, Jun 7, 18:12:33
  - “soft goal” (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 18:21:33
    - oh gawd... (NCFC) - promethian1, Jun 7, 18:27:14
- Gooooooood Lord. (NCFC) - Old Man, Jun 7, 17:11:51
  - ☝️👍 (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Jun 7, 18:58:18
  - Very true indeed (as per article below) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jun 7, 17:26:50
- And this is exactly why there are no openly gay footballers. Because of people like you (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jun 7, 17:08:15
- And this is exactly why there are no openly gay footballers. Because of people like you (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jun 7, 17:07:57
- Fucking Nora!!! (NCFC) - TheGrump, Jun 7, 16:39:02
- There are a fair few openly gay women footballers (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 7, 16:34:10
- Is that meant as some kind of defence to your outdated bigoted views? (n/m) (NCFC) - maidstoneyellow, Jun 7, 16:33:32
- I'd do a big fist pump (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jun 7, 16:31:00
  - Nurse! (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:32:05
- Alright, breathe... (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jun 7, 16:29:07
  - I think he would cheer and probably cum his pants (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jun 7, 17:10:41
- I wouldn't care (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jun 7, 16:28:09
- A strange analogy (NCFC) - Oscarnary, Jun 7, 16:19:04
  - Ha ha. Anal. You wrote anal. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:25:49
    - Oops (NCFC) - Oscarnary, Jun 7, 16:27:45
- I'd be astonished and insanely proud (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jun 7, 16:18:10
  - "Seemingly allows". This is not a conversation started in good faith (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jun 7, 16:22:32
    - i think that might count as some sort of technical homosexualiity (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 16:25:02
      - It's okay as long as your birch yourself for 12 hours afterwards (n/m) (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jun 7, 16:27:35
        
        Now, that really would be a good goal celebration (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 16:30:03
- People are going to dunk on you for this hypothetical scenario, but (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 7, 16:13:52
  - It's a staggeringly stupid analogy isn't it? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 7, 16:15:58
    - Kind of, but (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 7, 16:37:57
    - Could be trolling (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 16:24:38
      - I think it’s an amusing anal-ogy. (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:30:33
      - Generally, I think trolls play a valuable role (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 16:27:42
- I'd join in (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 7, 16:08:02
  - What, and enroach upon the field of play? Therein lies the real crime here! (n/m) (NCFC) - 702, Jun 7, 16:09:22
- I would be over the moon, that two NCFC players (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Jun 7, 16:04:54
- If you played for Norwich, in the mid 90s say, and Ruel Fox put in a peach of a cross that (NCFC) - 702, Jun 7, 15:57:17
  - saucy wink and pursed lips I reckon (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 16:00:29
- More to the point though, how about answering some straightforward questions (NCFC) - norway, Jun 7, 15:56:32
- I need some more detail (NCFC) - norway, Jun 7, 15:55:08
  - Oh no, it’s happened again. (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:09:07
  - Haha (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 7, 15:58:22
  - New goal music (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Jun 7, 15:57:38
    - I was hoping that link was “Je t’aime, moi non plus”. (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:10:37
      - I was hoping it was this (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 16:17:00
  - All good points (NCFC) - Highlander, Jun 7, 15:56:55
    - Well, whatever they are, the same laws will apply (NCFC) - norway, Jun 7, 16:00:50
      - Presumably it would have to be outraging public decency? (NCFC) - Old Git, Jun 7, 16:03:41
        
        I don't think people snog in public as much as they used to (NCFC) - camcan, Jun 7, 16:32:28
        
        “Inside” (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jun 7, 16:11:04
        
        lol - indeed. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Jun 7, 16:04:57
- "overly close" - who decides what the right amount of closeness is? The ref? The fans? (n/m) (NCFC) - 702, Jun 7, 15:55:05
  - The ref would measure and mark out the permissible zone of encroachment with his sprayy (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jun 7, 16:41:34
  - VAR (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jun 7, 16:14:52
    - Of course (n/m) (NCFC) - 702, Jun 7, 16:16:09
  - The law (NCFC) - Highlander, Jun 7, 15:59:34
    - I'm not sure there's a law against kissing and cuddling in public? (NCFC) - 702, Jun 7, 16:04:51
      - Yes... “wife”. (n/m) (NCFC) - Wilts, Jun 7, 19:33:36
- Perfectly comfortable, although I’d probably class a (NCFC) - woody, Jun 7, 15:54:13
  - Dismissive humour (NCFC) - Highlander, Jun 7, 16:01:58
    - I really didn't find it difficult at all. I can see that you are unlikely to be able to (NCFC) - woody, Jun 7, 16:25:49
  - I'd want it to be properly choreographed (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 15:59:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.