It was Cameron that made the promise that effectively bound parliament to a deliberately

non binding referendum.

Was one of the biggest mistakes of this whole process.

The intention of the vote was to be indicative of opinion, and the start of a national conversation.
had it been binding, the result would have been overturned and declared unsafe by ow, as has already been established in court.
As it wasn't binding, there is nothing to overturn.

Posted By: megson on March 26th 2019 at 08:40:42

Message Thread

Zelda seems very confused by all this. It’s quite simple isn’t it? Perhaps more simple (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Mar 25, 22:53:44
- Tbf it wasn’t a binding decision. (General Chat) - pieman63, Mar 25, 23:07:06
  - And if I dare to say, opinions change over 2/3 years. (General Chat) - pieman63, Mar 25, 23:13:15
    - If you’re asking me then there’s nothing wrong with it other than the (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Mar 25, 23:27:55
    - I'm sure you can come up with an answer that suits your beliefs. (n/m) (General Chat) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Mar 25, 23:16:41
      - I’ll keep working on it... (n/m) (General Chat) - pieman63, Mar 25, 23:21:46
  - Legally you’re absolutely right. But was taken as if it were binding, simply (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Mar 25, 23:10:12
    - It was Cameron that made the promise that effectively bound parliament to a deliberately (General Chat) - megson, Mar 26, 08:40:42
    - That’s how it panned out for sure. (n/m) (General Chat) - pieman63, Mar 25, 23:23:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.