And if I dare to say, opinions change over 2/3 years.

So why not ask people again? Now we know what’s what. An informed decision put in front of a far more informed electorate.

Now I’m not the sharpest knife in the box, but why does asking people what they think when they know more count as undemocratic?

Posted By: pieman63 on March 25th 2019 at 23:13:15

Message Thread

Zelda seems very confused by all this. It’s quite simple isn’t it? Perhaps more simple (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Mar 25, 22:53:44
- Tbf it wasn’t a binding decision. (General Chat) - pieman63, Mar 25, 23:07:06
  - And if I dare to say, opinions change over 2/3 years. (General Chat) - pieman63, Mar 25, 23:13:15
    - If you’re asking me then there’s nothing wrong with it other than the (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Mar 25, 23:27:55
    - I'm sure you can come up with an answer that suits your beliefs. (n/m) (General Chat) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Mar 25, 23:16:41
      - I’ll keep working on it... (n/m) (General Chat) - pieman63, Mar 25, 23:21:46
  - Legally you’re absolutely right. But was taken as if it were binding, simply (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Mar 25, 23:10:12
    - It was Cameron that made the promise that effectively bound parliament to a deliberately (General Chat) - megson, Mar 26, 08:40:42
    - That’s how it panned out for sure. (n/m) (General Chat) - pieman63, Mar 25, 23:23:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.