Because it should be a one on one opportunity between taker and keeper
Having another shot when the keeper is on the ground is an unfair advantage.
Posted By: tim berry on March 5th 2019 at 11:47:29
Message Thread
- Some interesting changes to the rules of the game coming next season... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Mar 5, 09:12:08
- No rebounds from pelantys is shit. How sterile do they want the game? (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Mar 5, 13:49:16
- And not happening, it seems (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Mar 5, 14:39:01
- I would not allow substitutes in added time except for genuine injury (n/m) (NCFC) - Saucerer, Mar 5, 12:02:23
- define genuine injury and how you would gauge that (n/m) (NCFC) - Jester, Mar 5, 12:09:56
- Agreed, in theory a good idea, in reality noy possible (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 13:09:55
- define genuine injury and how you would gauge that (n/m) (NCFC) - Jester, Mar 5, 12:09:56
- Looks like the penalty rebound one isn’t happening? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Mar 5, 10:26:07
- "The 1st edition mistakenly referred to a [penalty] rule which will not come into effect") (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Mar 5, 10:32:40
- Great news regarding subs (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 09:51:00
- Won't they just move to the center circle? (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Mar 5, 10:18:20
- Yup (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Mar 5, 11:55:20
- Airlift is the only option (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Mar 5, 11:55:37
- The only option is for play to continue (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 13:10:49
- Airlift is the only option (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Mar 5, 11:55:37
- Yup (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Mar 5, 11:55:20
- Players choice isn’t it (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 09:52:26
- Pointless then (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 10:04:26
- Won't they just move to the center circle? (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Mar 5, 10:18:20
- The rebound from penalty rule is long overdue (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Mar 5, 09:35:26
- Vmt. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Mar 5, 12:07:28
- since the 1975 League Cup Final, in my book (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Mar 5, 10:21:22
- Disagree (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 10:05:05
- The Watford Leicester moment was incredible but (NCFC) - tim berry, Mar 5, 11:21:43
- why are angry about it (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 5, 11:36:14
- Because it should be a one on one opportunity between taker and keeper (NCFC) - tim berry, Mar 5, 11:47:29
- the point is once the penalty is taken (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 5, 13:05:28
- Because it should be a one on one opportunity between taker and keeper (NCFC) - tim berry, Mar 5, 11:47:29
- why are angry about it (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 5, 11:36:14
- I am in agreement with your disagreement (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 5, 10:22:24
- Agreed (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Mar 5, 10:33:31
- I guess the main aim is to make it unneccesary for players to encroach? (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 5, 10:18:24
- VAR can sort that (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 11:50:58
- The Watford Leicester moment was incredible but (NCFC) - tim berry, Mar 5, 11:21:43
- The one I'd like to see brought in is.. (NCFC) - bowfront1, Mar 5, 09:34:06
- It should be! What is the assistant doing? I've flagged them before (n/m) (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Mar 5, 11:55:09
- no "attacking players"? (NCFC) - paulg, Mar 5, 09:31:29
- The whole of the Ipswich squad will be able to stand in the wall (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Mar 5, 09:33:00
- I think it refers to players from the attacking team (n/m) (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Mar 5, 09:32:43
- ah, sorry ... I'm being more than usually dopey (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Mar 5, 10:14:17
- Not sure I've seen a goal given where the ball has hit a hand... (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 5, 09:21:49
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 09:55:39
- Actually, Maradona (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 09:56:08
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 09:55:39
- Hurrm. (NCFC) - Bungle, Mar 5, 09:21:25
- Not sure about the hand ball rolling....that seems a bit illogical. (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Mar 5, 09:29:09
- Well nobody will really care if it doesn't go into the goal. (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 5, 09:32:02
- the substitute thing isn't really about time-wasting though - that's breaking up play and (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Mar 5, 09:57:39
- well, unless... (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 5, 09:36:44
- Ruling even (n/m) (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Mar 5, 09:30:04
- Well nobody will really care if it doesn't go into the goal. (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 5, 09:32:02
- What happens if the keeper saves it? (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 5, 09:24:13
- Not sure about the hand ball rolling....that seems a bit illogical. (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Mar 5, 09:29:09
- Also if any of the big six are not winning, Injury time will continue till they are. (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Mar 5, 09:20:31
- No rebounds from pelantys is shit. How sterile do they want the game? (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Mar 5, 13:49:16
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.