Won't a 48 team world cup just mean we get more of those s**t 'Defence v attack' games
we currently have to endure in qualifying in the actual tournament instead?
Terrible idea.
Posted By: megson on April 13th 2018 at 08:34:11
Message Thread
- Won't a 48 team world cup just mean we get more of those shit 'Defence v attack' games (Other Football) - megson, Apr 13, 08:34:11
- More bribe money for Thiefa (Other Football) - usacanary, Apr 13, 14:24:45
- 3 team groups (Other Football) - Jester, Apr 13, 10:25:22
- Might at well get rid of qualifying as it will be too easy to qualify. (n/m) (Other Football) - Trent_Canary, Apr 13, 08:53:45
- is the correct answer (Other Football) - CWC, Apr 13, 09:31:33
- On top of hosting it in a small yet oil-rich middle eastern country? (Other Football) - APB, Apr 13, 08:41:43
- you're both thinking like fans (Other Football) - CWC, Apr 13, 08:52:27
- Yes, sorry, as you were. (n/m) (Other Football) - megson, Apr 13, 11:41:26
- True. Not long before the next round of “no relegation” and 39th game talks, I guess. (Other Football) - APB, Apr 13, 08:59:40
- you're both thinking like fans (Other Football) - CWC, Apr 13, 08:52:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.