Stat-tastic
It could be that 40 is a little on the high side as there appear to be to more top teams and I think the group of them are all much stronger than the rest.
(I know this sound a statement of the bleedin obvious but I couldn't think of another way of wording it)
Posted By: KentonCanary on December 19th 2011 at 12:21:24
Message Thread
- Relegation Stat Attack. The current bootom 3 need points per game ratios of............... (NCFC) - megson, Dec 19, 12:07:47
- if we were to thake their recent form and apply their average PPG across the rest of the s (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 19, 12:26:56
- maybe better to look at it once everyone has played each other (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 19, 12:32:06
- even better to look at it when everyone has played each other twice (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Dec 19, 12:52:31
- maybe better to look at it once everyone has played each other (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 19, 12:32:06
- Stat-tastic (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Dec 19, 12:21:24
- No I get your point, that to 6 -8 will have a little buffer between them and the rest of (NCFC) - megson, Dec 19, 12:22:53
- Splendid work. Magic number will be lower than 40 though, surely. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 19, 12:16:33
- Aye, I think 36/37 likely to be enough, all depends on that last spot really. (NCFC) - megson, Dec 19, 12:19:10
- That's what Usac reckons. He knows his shizzle. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Dec 19, 12:17:28
- Stopped clocks? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 19, 12:19:35
- Need winding up (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 19, 12:20:58
- No, he's alright is usac. I know he tilts you but he posts some interesting stuff. (NCFC) - jafski, Dec 19, 12:20:56
- Mostly posts long complicated versions of the bleeding obvious imo (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Dec 19, 13:01:14
- The blindingly obvious or unutterably trivial. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 19, 13:20:58
- Mostly posts long complicated versions of the bleeding obvious imo (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Dec 19, 13:01:14
- Stopped clocks? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 19, 12:19:35
- So we need 0.909. Mmm - like it (n/m) (NCFC) - woody, Dec 19, 12:12:00
- Good stat work. Liking it. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Dec 19, 12:09:28
- Yes bootom. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Dec 19, 12:08:02
- if we were to thake their recent form and apply their average PPG across the rest of the s (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 19, 12:26:56
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.