Relegation Stat Attack. The current bootom 3 need points per game ratios of...............
Wigan 1.22
blackburn 1.36
Bolton 1.40
To reach the magic 40.
Last season, a team managing those PPG's over the season would have finished with 46, 51 and 53 points. These totals would have got them 12th 8th and 8th.
In Summary, Bolton and Blackburn need to perform like top 8 sides for the rest of the season to hit 40 points, Wigan like a mid table side.
Wigan capable of that, Bolton and Blackburn not likely to be.
What does it mean? Fuck all probably, it interested the geek in me to find out though.
Posted By: megson on December 19th 2011 at 12:07:47
Message Thread
- Relegation Stat Attack. The current bootom 3 need points per game ratios of............... (NCFC) - megson, Dec 19, 12:07:47
- if we were to thake their recent form and apply their average PPG across the rest of the s (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 19, 12:26:56
- maybe better to look at it once everyone has played each other (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 19, 12:32:06
- even better to look at it when everyone has played each other twice (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Dec 19, 12:52:31
- maybe better to look at it once everyone has played each other (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 19, 12:32:06
- Stat-tastic (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Dec 19, 12:21:24
- No I get your point, that to 6 -8 will have a little buffer between them and the rest of (NCFC) - megson, Dec 19, 12:22:53
- Splendid work. Magic number will be lower than 40 though, surely. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 19, 12:16:33
- Aye, I think 36/37 likely to be enough, all depends on that last spot really. (NCFC) - megson, Dec 19, 12:19:10
- That's what Usac reckons. He knows his shizzle. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Dec 19, 12:17:28
- Stopped clocks? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 19, 12:19:35
- Need winding up (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 19, 12:20:58
- No, he's alright is usac. I know he tilts you but he posts some interesting stuff. (NCFC) - jafski, Dec 19, 12:20:56
- Mostly posts long complicated versions of the bleeding obvious imo (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Dec 19, 13:01:14
- The blindingly obvious or unutterably trivial. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 19, 13:20:58
- Mostly posts long complicated versions of the bleeding obvious imo (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Dec 19, 13:01:14
- Stopped clocks? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 19, 12:19:35
- So we need 0.909. Mmm - like it (n/m) (NCFC) - woody, Dec 19, 12:12:00
- Good stat work. Liking it. (n/m) (NCFC) - jafski, Dec 19, 12:09:28
- Yes bootom. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Dec 19, 12:08:02
- if we were to thake their recent form and apply their average PPG across the rest of the s (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 19, 12:26:56
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.