No

He offered 20m in exchange for new equity, which may well have made him the majority shareholder. Though that would have been 20m in the bank for the shareholders to decide how best to deploy.

Posted By: BerlinCanary, Nov 13, 09:01:22

Follow Ups

1
That's the clincher IMO, Cullum WOULD have been majority share holder
Posted By: harry boulders, Nov 13, 09:47:47
10
Which is the way any new investment would be made isnt it?
Posted By: DiscoDaleGordon, Nov 13, 09:13:57

Reply to Message

Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025