This is my point really, I've heard most of the attacks at Roeder

everyone has been used, from Chris Martin should be given a chance, as a snipe at our forward line, to Chadwick is loving it at MK dons, as a swipe at buying hoolihan

Loans are the main topic now, with general line of "I don't even know my team anymore" as the main dig of that, making out Norwich isn't team when we don't own the players

The players we do own don't perform near the standard required

I don't get the big deal of the loans, as Hamilton, Worthington and Grant all used loans, just Roeder has used more

The difference is, Roeders loans play a lot better than the previous 3 managers, yet it's something to attack him for

Like I said in the very first post, it seems patience is the problem here, and every straw is clutched at in droves when the power of suggestion is levelled

It also surprises me that a year is the benchmark for evaluation. Roeders just past that mark and after throwing 3 points away because of the stupidity of one of our players, the smell of the sack lingers

No matter the ill feeling which I can understand, I don't understand why that has to be overblown into the ridiculous

Posted By: pants, Nov 8, 23:00:13