I agree with you but it seems that no matter how poor

he plays he's never considered to be dropped or indeed substituted. Two goals in nine games is hardly brilliant and I wouldn't mind if he looked like he was trying and he set a few other people up with chances. I think that's why people booed Roeders substitutions of Croft and Wes because Sibierski was so poor he really should've been replaced. I know the counter-argument is that eventually he won the game for us and it's hard to argue against that. Something else I don't know whether anyone else noticed but he gave the ball away so easily and it led to their striker winning the penalty. When you think what Dion did for us in a similar role last season and what Sibierski adds it's incomparable.

Posted By: Chopper, Oct 27, 11:49:42