I saw the substitution of Croft a strategic one.

He tends to run left-backs ragged throughout the game. Let him tire them out and bring a fresh pair of legs on towards the end of the game to take the advantage. This showed as Bell was able to get round the full-back and get some decent balls in. I think the decision is a tactical one and nothing against Crofty's ability or effort during the game.

But if the boo-boys want to boo they'll invent a reason for it.

Posted By: Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Oct 27, 09:26:07