Who knows...

I'm saying i will not turn on the board, who have done most things right... Why wouldn't they financially back worthington after relegation? he had hardly done a bad job at this point.. why wouldn't they back him when it got a little rouch when we had just enjoyed a great spell under him which started with us in a similar situation as we were in at that time? Why wouldn't they give the job to a peter grant who could really talk the talk.. only one way to find out if he could walk the walk.. he couldn't.. they got rid, got in a manager who in my opnion was a decent choice.. i fail to see the major failing of the board myself... maybe worthington was given a little too long.. other then that i dont think it was that bad..inexperiance manager peter grant was, but every great manager once fell under that bracket.

Posted By: Alan, Nov 18, 22:03:06