why did he take Spillane off rather than Hucks when Croft came on?

you CANNOT play Hucks and Croft AND two strikers. From that point on we didn't have enough ball winners on the pitch and thus couldn't get the ball off them, whereas we had at least matched them until that point. Altrnatively he could have left Hucks on and put him up front while taking Cureton off. But since Hucks was our worst player yesterday taking him off would have made more sense.

Posted By: mr carra, Sep 30, 14:04:35